M. Anguelova, J. Karlsson, and M. Jirstrand, Minimal output sets for identifiability, Mathematical Biosciences, vol.239, issue.1, pp.139-153
DOI : 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.04.005

R. Baldwin, Introduction: history and future of modelling nutrient utilization in farm animals In Modelling nutrient utilization in farm animals, pp.1-9, 2000.

R. Baldwin, J. Thornley, and D. Beever, Metabolism of the lactating cow: II. Digestive elements of a mechanistic model, Journal of Dairy Research, vol.29, issue.01, pp.107-131, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/0308-521X(81)90002-0

E. Balsa-canto and J. Banga, Advanced model identification using global optimization. Theoretical introduction, 2010.

E. Balsa-canto and J. Banga, AMIGO, a toolbox for advanced model identification in systems biology using global optimization, Bioinformatics, vol.27, issue.16, pp.2311-2313, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr370

J. Baranyi, T. Ross, T. Mcmeekin, and T. Roberts, Effects of parameterization on the performance of empirical models used in `predictive microbiology', Food Microbiology, vol.13, issue.1, pp.83-91, 1996.
DOI : 10.1006/fmic.1996.0011

C. Barnes, The art of catchment modeling: What is a good model?, Environment International, vol.21, issue.5, pp.747-751, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0160-4120(95)00082-V

R. Bellman and K. Astrom, On structural identifiability, Mathematical Biosciences, vol.7, issue.3-4, pp.329-339, 1970.
DOI : 10.1016/0025-5564(70)90132-X

G. Bellu, M. Saccomani, S. Audoly, D. Angio, and L. , DAISY: A new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol.88, issue.1, pp.52-61, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.07.002

H. Boer, S. Butler, C. Stotzel, T. Pas, M. Veerkamp et al., Validation of a mathematical model of the bovine estrous cycle for cows with different estrous cycle characteristics, animal, vol.92, pp.1-11, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.04.017

R. Boston, P. Wilkins, and L. Tedeschi, Identifiability and Accuracy: Two critical problems associated with the application of models in nutrition and the health sciences, Mathematical modeling for nutrition and health sciences, pp.161-193, 2007.

L. Braems, L. Jaulin, M. Kieffer, and E. Walter, Guaranteed numerical alternatives to structural identiflability testing, Proceedings of the 40th Ieee Conference on Decision and Control, Vols 1-5, pp.3122-3127, 2001.
DOI : 10.1109/.2001.980298

E. Carson, C. Cobelli, and L. Finkelstein, The Mathematical Modeling of Metabolic and Endocrine Systems: Model Formulation, Identification, and Validation, 1983.

G. Cedersund, Conclusions via unique predictions obtained despite unidentifiability - new definitions and a general method, FEBS Journal, vol.22, issue.18, pp.3513-3527
DOI : 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08725.x

O. Chis, A. Villaverde, J. Banga, and E. Balsa-canto, On the relationship between sloppiness and identifiability, Mathematical Biosciences, vol.282, pp.141-161, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mbs.2016.10.009
URL : https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/139453/1/Relationship_sloppiness_identifiability_preprint.pdf

O. Chis, J. Banga, and E. Balsa-canto, GenSSI: a software toolbox for structural identifiability analysis of biological models, Bioinformatics, vol.27, pp.2610-2611
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr431

O. Chis, J. Banga, and E. Balsa-canto, Structural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods, PLoS ONE, vol.6, issue.11
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0027755.s001

J. Dijkstra, J. France, M. Dhanoa, J. Maas, M. Hanigan et al., A Model to Describe Growth Patterns of the Mammary Gland During Pregnancy and Lactation, Journal of Dairy Science, vol.80, issue.10, pp.2340-2354, 1997.
DOI : 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76185-X

A. Doeschl-wilson, The role of mathematical models of host???pathogen interactions for livestock health and production ??? a review, animal, vol.40, issue.06, pp.895-910, 2011.
DOI : 10.1017/S1751731110002557

J. France, Mathematical modelling in agricultural science, Weed Research, vol.3, issue.6, pp.419-423, 1988.
DOI : 10.1079/BJN19560015

N. Friggens, G. Emmans, and R. Veerkamp, On the use of simple ratios between lactation curve coefficients to describe parity effects on milk production, Livestock Production Science, vol.62, issue.1, pp.1-13, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00110-4

N. Friggens, L. Brun-lafleur, P. Faverdin, D. Sauvant, and O. Martin, Advances in predicting nutrient partitioning in the dairy cow: recognizing the central role of genotype and its expression through time, animal, vol.1, issue.s1, pp.89-101, 2013.
DOI : 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73787-4
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01001341

R. Gutenkunst, J. Waterfall, F. Casey, K. Brown, C. Myers et al., Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models, PLoS Comput Biol, vol.3, pp.1871-1878, 2007.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030189
URL : http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030189

M. Hanigan, A. Rius, E. Kolver, and C. Palliser, A Redefinition of the Representation of Mammary Cells and Enzyme Activities in a Lactating Dairy Cow Model, Journal of Dairy Science, vol.90, issue.8, pp.3816-3830, 2007.
DOI : 10.3168/jds.2007-0028

J. Karlsson, M. Anguelova, and M. Jirstrand, An Efficient Method for Structural Identifiability Analysis of Large Dynamic Systems*, 16th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, pp.941-946, 2012.
DOI : 10.3182/20120711-3-BE-2027.00381

H. Khalil, Nonlinear systems. Pearson Education International Inc, 2000.

J. Locke, A. Millar, and M. Turner, Modelling genetic networks with noisy and varied experimental data: the circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol.234, issue.3, pp.383-393, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.11.038

T. Maiwald and J. Timmer, Dynamical modeling and multi-experiment fitting with PottersWheel, Bioinformatics, vol.24, issue.18, pp.2037-2043, 2008.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn350
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2530888

O. Martin and D. Sauvant, A teleonomic model describing performance (body, milk and intake) during growth and over repeated reproductive cycles throughout the lifespan of dairy cattle. 1. Trajectories of life function priorities and genetic scaling, animal, vol.12, issue.12, pp.2030-2047, 2010.
DOI : 10.1017/S1751731110001357
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01173547

J. Mills, J. Dijkstra, A. Bannink, S. Cammell, E. Kebreab et al., A mechanistic model of whole-tract digestion and methanogenesis in the lactating dairy cow: model development, evaluation, and application., Journal of Animal Science, vol.79, issue.6, pp.1584-1597, 2001.
DOI : 10.2527/2001.7961584x

P. Moate, R. Boston, T. Jenkins, and I. Lean, Kinetics of Ruminal Lipolysis of Triacylglycerol and Biohydrogenation of Long-Chain Fatty Acids: New Insights from Old Data, Journal of Dairy Science, vol.91, issue.2, pp.731-742, 2008.
DOI : 10.3168/jds.2007-0398

R. Muñoz-tamayo, S. Giger-reverdin, and D. Sauvant, Mechanistic modelling of in vitro fermentation and methane production by rumen microbiota, Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol.220, pp.1-21, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.07.005

R. Muñoz-tamayo, B. Laroche, M. Leclerc, and E. Walter, IDEAS: a Parameter Identification Toolbox with Symbolic Analysis of Uncertainty and its Application to Biological Modelling, Prepints of the 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, pp.1271-1276, 2009.
DOI : 10.3182/20090706-3-FR-2004.00211

R. Muñoz-tamayo, P. Martinon, G. Bougaran, F. Mairet, and O. Bernard, Getting the most out of it: Optimal experiments for parameter estimation of microalgae growth models, Journal of Process Control, vol.24, issue.6, pp.991-1001, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.04.021

L. Puillet, O. Martin, M. Tichit, and D. Sauvant, Simple representation of physiological regulations in a model of lactating female: application to the dairy goat, animal, vol.75, issue.02, pp.235-246, 2008.
DOI : 10.1017/S1751731107657772
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01173460

A. Raue, J. Karlsson, M. Saccomani, M. Jirstrand, and J. Timmer, Comparison of approaches for parameter identifiability analysis of biological systems, Bioinformatics, vol.30, issue.10, pp.1440-1448, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu006

A. Raue, C. Kreutz, T. Maiwald, J. Bachmann, M. Schilling et al., Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood, Bioinformatics, vol.25, issue.15, pp.1923-1929, 2009.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp358

R. Roper, M. Saccomani, and P. Vicini, Cellular signaling identifiability analysis: A case study, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol.264, issue.2, pp.528-537, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.02.029

M. Saccomani, S. Audoly, D. Angio, and L. , Parameter identifiability of nonlinear systems: the role of initial conditions, Automatica, vol.39, issue.4, pp.619-632, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00302-3

D. Sauvant, Modelling homeostatic and homeorhetic regulations in lactating animals, Livestock Production Science, vol.39, issue.1, pp.105-113, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0301-6226(94)90162-7

J. Schaber and E. Klipp, Model-based inference of biochemical parameters and dynamic properties of microbial signal transduction networks, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol.22, issue.1, pp.109-116, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.09.014

C. Spedding, General aspects of modelling and its application in livestock production In Modelling of livestock production systems (eds. S Korver and JAM Van Arendonk) Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models, Agricultural Systems, vol.89, pp.3-13, 1988.

L. Vargas-villamil and L. Tedeschi, Potential integration of multi-fitting, inverse problem and mechanistic modelling approaches to applied research in animal science: a review, Animal Production Science, vol.54, pp.1905-1913
DOI : 10.1071/AN14568

A. Villaverde and A. Barreiro, Identifiability of large nonlinear biochemical networks, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem, vol.76, pp.259-296

A. Villaverde, A. Barreiro, and A. Papachristodoulou, Structural Identifiability of Dynamic Systems Biology Models, PLOS Computational Biology, vol.67, issue.6???7, 2016.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005153.s003

E. Walter and L. Pronzato, On the identifiability and distinguishability of nonlinear parametric models, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol.42, issue.2-3, pp.125-134, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-4754(95)00123-9

E. Walter and L. Pronzato, Identification of Parametric Models from Experimental Data, 1997.

L. White, N. Evans, T. Lam, Y. Schukken, G. Medley et al., The structural identifiability and parameter estimation of a multispecies model for the transmission of mastitis in dairy cows with postmilking teat disinfection, Mathematical Biosciences, vol.180, issue.1-2, pp.275-291, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00130-X

P. Wood, Algebraic Model of the Lactation Curve in Cattle, Nature, vol.22, issue.5111, p.164, 1967.
DOI : 10.1038/216164a0

X. Wu, B. Heringstad, and D. Gianola, Bayesian structural equation models for inferring relationships between phenotypes: a review of methodology, identifiability, and applications, Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, vol.155, issue.1, pp.3-15, 2010.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2009.00835.x

R. Bellman and K. Astrom, On structural identifiability, Mathematical Biosciences, vol.7, issue.3-4, pp.329-339, 1970.
DOI : 10.1016/0025-5564(70)90132-X

E. Carson, C. Cobelli, and L. Finkelstein, The Mathematical Modeling of Metabolic and Endocrine Systems: Model Formulation, Identification, and Validation, 1983.

O. Chis, J. Banga, and E. Balsa-canto, Structural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods, PLoS ONE, vol.6, issue.11, 2011.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0027755.s001

H. Miao, X. Xia, A. Perelson, and H. Wu, On Identifiability of Nonlinear ODE Models and Applications in Viral Dynamics, SIAM Review, vol.53, issue.1, pp.3-39, 2011.
DOI : 10.1137/090757009

H. Pohjanpalo, System identifiability based on the power series expansion of the solution, Mathematical Biosciences, vol.41, issue.1-2, pp.21-33, 1978.
DOI : 10.1016/0025-5564(78)90063-9

E. Walter and Y. Lecourtier, Global approaches to identifiability testing for linear and nonlinear state space models, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol.24, issue.6, pp.472-482, 1982.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-4754(82)90645-0

M. Anguelova, J. Karlsson, and M. Jirstrand, Minimal output sets for identifiability, Mathematical Biosciences, vol.239, issue.1, pp.139-153
DOI : 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.04.005

O. Chis, J. Banga, and E. Balsa-canto, GenSSI: a software toolbox for structural identifiability analysis of biological models, Bioinformatics, vol.27, pp.2610-2611, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr431

R. Noble, J. Moore, and C. Harfoot, Observations on the pattern on biohydrogenation of esterified and unesterified linoleic acid in the rumen, British Journal of Nutrition, vol.88, issue.01, pp.99-108, 1974.
DOI : 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85514-0

R. Balsa-canto, E. Alonso, A. Banga, and J. , Computational procedures for optimal experimental design in biological systems, IET Systems Biology, vol.2, issue.4, pp.163-172, 2008.
DOI : 10.1049/iet-syb:20070069

E. Carson, C. Cobelli, and L. Finkelstein, The Mathematical Modeling of Metabolic and Endocrine Systems: Model Formulation, Identification, and Validation, 1983.

S. Marsili-libelli, S. Guerrizio, and N. Checchi, Confidence regions of estimated parameters for ecological systems, Ecological Modelling, vol.165, issue.2-3, pp.127-146, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00068-1

E. Walter and L. Pronzato, Identification of Parametric Models from Experimental Data, 1997.