M. Andersson, Sexual selection, vol.624, p.pp, 1994.

S. J. Arnold, Bateman's principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals, American Naturalist, vol.144, pp.126-149, 1994.

S. J. Arnold and M. J. Wade, On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Applications, Evolution, vol.38, pp.720-734, 1984.

S. J. Arnold and M. J. Wade, On the measurement of natural and sexual selection, Theory. Evolution, vol.38, pp.709-719, 1984.

S. J. Arnold and D. Duvall, Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory, American Naturalist, vol.143, pp.317-348, 1994.
DOI : 10.1086/285606

G. Arnqvist and T. Nilsson, The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects, Animal Behaviour, vol.60, pp.145-164, 2000.

J. C. Aymes, M. Larrieu, C. Tentelier, and J. Labonne, Occurrence and variation of egg cannibalism in brown trout Salmo trutta, Naturwissenschaften, vol.97, pp.435-439, 2010.

A. J. Bateman, Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila, Heredity, vol.2, pp.349-368, 1948.
DOI : 10.1038/hdy.1948.21
URL : http://www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v2/n3/pdf/hdy194821a.pdf

U. Candolin, T. Salesto, and M. Evers, Changed environmental conditions weaken sexual selection in sticklebacks, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol.20, pp.233-239, 2007.

E. L. Charnov, Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem, Theoretical Population Biology, vol.9, issue.2, pp.129-136, 1976.
DOI : 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x
URL : http://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=biol_fsp

J. M. Collet, R. F. Dean, K. Worley, D. S. Richardson, and T. Pizzar, The measure and significance of Bateman's principles, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol.281, 2014.

D. W. Coltman, D. R. Bancroft, A. Robertson, J. A. Smith, T. H. Clutton-brock et al., Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity, Molecular Ecology, vol.8, pp.1199-1209, 1999.

A. Courtiol, L. Etienne, R. Feron, and B. Godelle, The evolution of mutual mate choice under direct benefits, American Naturalist, vol.188, pp.521-538, 2016.

J. F. Crow, Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man, Human Biology, vol.61, pp.763-775, 1989.

D. Damiens and G. Boivin, Why do sperm-depleted parasitoid males continue to mate?, Behavioral, vol.17, pp.138-143, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/beheco/arj009
URL : https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article-pdf/17/1/138/17275027/arj009.pdf

D. Gaudemar, B. Beall, and E. , Reproductive behavioural sequences of single pairs of Atlantic salmon in an experimental stream, Animal Behaviour, vol.57, pp.1207-1217, 1999.

B. D. Dow and M. V. Ashley, Factors influencing male mating success in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. New For, vol.15, pp.161-180, 1998.

P. Fiske, P. T. Rintamäki, and E. Karvonen, Mating success in lekking males: a meta-analysis, Behavioral Ecology, vol.9, pp.328-338, 1998.
DOI : 10.1093/beheco/9.4.328
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.500.3633

A. M. Franklin, Z. E. Squires, and D. Stuart-fox, The energetic cost of mating in a promiscuous cephalopod, Biology Letters, vol.8, pp.754-756, 2012.

K. Fritzsche and I. Booksmythe, The measurement of sexual selection on females and males, Current Zoology, vol.59, pp.558-563, 2013.

D. Garant, J. J. Dodson, and L. Bernatchez, A genetic evaluation of mating system and determinants of individual reproductive success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.), Journal of Heredity, vol.92, pp.137-145, 2001.

Z. Gauthey, M. Freychet, A. Manicki, A. Herman, O. Lepais et al., The concentration of plasma metabolites varies throughout reproduction and affects offspring number in wild brown trout (Salmo trutta), Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, vol.184, pp.90-96, 2015.

Z. Gauthey, S. Panserat, A. Elosegi, A. Herman, C. Tentelier et al., Experimental evidence of population differences in reproductive investment conditional on environmental stochasticity, Science of The Total Environment, vol.541, pp.143-148, 2016.

A. Gelman and D. B. Rubin, Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences, Statistical Science, vol.7, pp.457-472, 1992.
DOI : 10.1214/ss/1177011136

P. A. Gowaty, Y. Kim, Y. Anderson, and W. W. , No evidence of sexual selection in a repetition of Bateman's classic study of Drosophila melanogaster, PNAS, vol.109, pp.11740-11745, 2012.

Y. Hsu, R. L. Earley, and L. L. Wolf, Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes, Biological Reviews, vol.81, pp.33-74, 2006.

A. Jacob, A. Nusslé, S. Britschgi, A. Evanno, G. Müller et al., Male dominance linked to size and age, but not to "good genes, BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol.7, 2007.
DOI : 10.1186/1471-2148-7-207
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2222247

L. Jacquin, Melanin in a changing world: coloration of brown trout predicts their reproductive success in variable environments

M. D. Jennions, M. D. Jennions, H. Kokko, and H. Klug, The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol.25, pp.591-598, 2012.

A. G. Jones, On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection, Evolution, vol.63, pp.1673-1684, 2009.

A. G. Jones and W. R. Ardren, Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations, Molecular Ecology, vol.12, pp.2511-2523, 2003.

A. G. Jones, J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold, Molecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: the response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio, American Naturalist, vol.164, pp.444-456, 2004.

N. Jonsson and B. Jonsson, Trade-off between egg mass and egg number in brown trout, Journal of Fish Biology, vol.55, pp.767-783, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/jfbi.1999.1035

S. T. Kalinowski, M. L. Taper, and T. C. Marshall, Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment, Molecular Ecology, vol.16, pp.1099-1106, 2007.

H. Klug, J. Heuschele, M. D. Jennions, and H. Kokko, The mismeasurement of sexual selection, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol.23, pp.447-462, 2010.

H. Kokko, A. Mackenzie, J. D. Reynolds, J. Lindström, and W. J. Sutherland, Measures of inequality are not equal, American Naturalist, vol.154, pp.358-382, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/2463657

L. T. Kregting, F. I. Thomas, A. L. Bass, and P. O. Yund, Relative effects of gamete compatibility and hydrodynamics on fertilization in the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, Biological Bulletin, vol.227, pp.33-39, 2014.

N. Kutsukake and C. L. Nunn, Comparative tests of reproductive skew in male primates: the roles of demographic factors and incomplete control, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol.60, pp.695-706, 2006.

J. Labonne, M. Augery, M. Parade, S. Brinkert, E. Prevost et al., Female preference for male body size in brown trout, Salmo trutta: is big still fashionable?, Animal Behaviour, vol.77, pp.129-137, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.09.018

J. Labonne, T. Régnier, and C. Tentelier, Reproductive system in brown trout: ongoing evolution?, pp.351-371, 2013.

R. Lande and S. J. Arnold, The measurement of selection on correlated characters, Evolution, vol.37, pp.1210-1226, 1983.

C. Magnhagen, Predation risk as a cost of reproduction, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.6, pp.183-186, 1991.

G. C. Mcdonald, R. James, J. Krause, and T. Pizzari, Sexual networks: measuring sexual selection in structured, polyandrous populations, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, vol.368, 1613.

J. A. Moorad and M. J. Wade, Selection Gradients, the Opportunity for Selection, the Coefficient of Determination, American Naturalist, vol.181, pp.291-300, 2013.

M. Moshgani and T. Dooren, Maternal and paternal contributions to egg size and egg number variation in the blackfin pearl killifish Austrolebias nigripinnis, Evolutionary Ecology, vol.25, pp.1179-1195, 2011.

P. G. Parker and Z. Tang-martinez, Bateman Gradients in Field and Laboratory Studies: A Cautionary Tale, Integrative and Comparative Biology, vol.45, pp.895-902, 2005.

B. Pélissié, P. Jarne, V. Sarda, and P. David, Disentangling precopulatory and postcopulatory sexual selection in polyandrous species, Evolution, vol.68, pp.1320-1331, 2014.

J. M. Pemberton, S. D. Albon, F. E. Guinness, T. H. Clutton-brock, and G. A. Dover, Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal, Behavioral Ecology, vol.3, pp.66-75, 1992.

E. Petersson, T. Järvi, H. Olsén, I. Mayer, and M. Hedenskog, Male-male competition and female choice in brown trout, Animal Behaviour, vol.57, pp.777-783, 1999.

C. Piou and E. Prévost, A demo-genetic individual-based model for Atlantic salmon populations: Model structure, parameterization and sensitivity, Ecological Modelling, vol.231, pp.37-52, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.025

A. Pischedda and W. R. Rice, Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components, PNAS, vol.109, pp.2049-2053, 2012.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.1110841109
URL : http://www.pnas.org/content/109/6/2049.full.pdf

M. Plummer, JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling, Proceedings of the 3 rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing, vol.124, p.pp, 2003.

A. Poiani and C. Wilks, Sexually Transmitted Diseases: A Possible Cost of Promiscuity in Birds?, The Auk, vol.117, pp.1061-1065, 2000.

G. R. Price, Selection and covariance, Nature, vol.227, pp.520-521, 1970.

S. Saleem, P. H. Ruggles, W. K. Abbott, and G. E. Carney, Sexual Experience Enhances Drosophila melanogaster Male Mating Behavior and Success, PLOS ONE, vol.9, 2014.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0096639
URL : http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096639

O. Seehausen, J. J. Van-alphen, and F. Witte, Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection, Science, vol.277, pp.1808-1811, 1997.
DOI : 10.1126/science.277.5333.1808
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.495.3716

D. Serbezov, L. Bernatchez, E. M. Olsen, and L. A. Vøllestad, Mating patterns and determinants of individual reproductive success in brown trout (Salmo trutta) revealed by parentage analysis of an entire stream living population, Molecular Ecology, vol.19, pp.3193-3205, 2010.

C. Tentelier, M. Larrieu, J. C. Aymes, and J. Labonne, Male antagonistic behaviour after spawning suggests paternal care in brown trout, Salmo trutta, Ecology of Freshwater Fish, vol.20, pp.580-587, 2011.

C. Tentelier, O. Lepais, N. Larranaga, A. Manicki, F. Lange et al., Sexual selection leads to a tenfold difference in reproductive success of alternative reproductive tactics in male Atlantic salmon. The Science of, Nature, vol.103, p.47, 2016.

C. Tentelier, J. C. Aymes, B. Spitz, and J. Rives, Using proximity loggers to describe the sexual network of a freshwater fish, Environmental Biology of Fishes, vol.99, pp.621-631, 2016.

D. J. Thompson, C. Hassall, C. D. Lowe, and P. C. Watts, Field estimates of reproductive success in a model insect: behavioural surrogates are poor predictors of fitness, Ecology Letters, vol.14, pp.905-913, 2011.

T. Uller and M. Olsson, Multiple paternity in reptiles: patterns and processes, Molecular Ecology, vol.17, pp.2566-2580, 2008.

M. J. Wade, Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success, American Naturalist, vol.114, pp.742-747, 1979.

M. J. Wade and S. J. Arnold, The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, sperm precedence, Animal Behaviour, vol.28, issue.80, pp.80052-80054, 1980.

C. Wedekind, A. Jacob, G. Evanno, S. Nusslé, and R. Müller, Viability of brown trout embryos positively linked to melanin-based but negatively to carotenoid-based colours of their fathers, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, vol.275, pp.1737-1744, 2008.

E. B. Ziv, A. Ilany, V. Demartsev, A. Barocas, E. Geffen et al., Individual, social, sexual niche traits affect copulation success in a polygynandrous mating system, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol.70, pp.901-912, 2016.