L. Amgoud, Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.55, issue.9, pp.2028-2048, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.004

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123709

L. Amgoud and J. Ben-naim, Ranking-Based Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks, Scalable Uncertainty Management -7th International Conference, SUM 2013 Proceedings, pp.134-147, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_11

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01239719

L. Amgoud and J. Ben-naim, Argumentation-based Ranking Logics, Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2015, pp.1511-1519, 2015.

L. Amgoud, P. Besnard, and S. Vesic, Equivalence in logic-based argumentation, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.24, issue.3, pp.181-208, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-015-6942-2

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123719

A. Arioua, Formalizing and Studying Dialectical Explanations in Inconsistent Knowledge Bases, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01448733

J. Baget, F. Garreau, M. Mugnier, and S. Rocher, Revisiting Chase Termination for Existential Rules and their Extension to Nonmonotonic Negation, 1071.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01097136

J. Baget, M. Lecì-ere, M. Mugnier, and E. Salvat, On rules with existential variables: Walking the decidability line, Artificial Intelligence, vol.175, issue.9-10, pp.9-101620, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2011.03.002

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00587012

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, A logic-based theory of deductive arguments??????This is an extended version of a paper entitled ???Towards a logic-based theory of argumentation??? published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'2000), Austin, TX, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000., Artificial Intelligence, vol.128, issue.1-2, pp.203-235, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00071-6

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, Elements of Argumentation, 2008.
DOI : 10.7551/mitpress/9780262026437.001.0001

A. Bondarenko, F. Toni, and R. A. Kowalski, An Assumption-Based Framework for Non-Monotonic Reasoning, LPNMR, pp.171-189, 1993.

E. Bonzon, J. Delobelle, S. Konieczny, and N. Maudet, A Comparative Study of Ranking-Based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation, Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.914-920, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01263996

P. Bourhis, M. Morak, and A. Pieris, The Impact of Disjunction on Query Answering Under Guarded-Based Existential Rules, IJCAI 2013, Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.796-802, 2013.

A. Caì-i, G. Gottlob, and T. Lukasiewicz, A general datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies, Proceedings of PODS 2009, pp.77-86, 2009.

M. Caminada and L. Amgoud, An Axiomatic Account of Formal Argumentation, Proceedings, The Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Seventeenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, pp.608-613, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s11225-009-9218-x

URL : http://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/16339/1/labml.pdf

C. Cayrol and M. Lagasquie-schiex, Graduality in Argumentation, J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), vol.23, pp.245-297, 2005.

M. Croitoru, R. Thomopoulos, and S. Vesic, Introducing Preference-Based Argumentation to Inconsistent Ontological Knowledge Bases, PRIMA 2015: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems -18th International Conference Proceedings, pp.594-602, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/11896548_26

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01242937

M. Croitoru and S. Vesic, What Can Argumentation Do for Inconsistent Ontology Query Answering?, Scalable Uncertainty Management -7th International Conference, SUM 2013 Proceedings, pp.15-29, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00812630

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-358, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

A. J. García and G. R. Simari, Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, vol.4, issue.1+2, pp.95-138, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/S1471068403001674

G. Gottlob, T. Lukasiewicz, and A. Pieris, Datalog+/-: Questions and Answers, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference, 2014.

J. Leite and J. Martins, Social Abstract Argumentation, IJCAI 2011, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.2287-2292, 2011.

D. Magka, M. Krötzsch, and I. Horrocks, Computing Stable Models for Nonmonotonic Existential Rules, Proceedings of IJCAI 2013, pp.1031-1038, 2013.

P. Matt and F. Toni, A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation, Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 11th European Conference Proceedings, pp.285-297, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_24

S. Modgil and H. Prakken, framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial, Argument & Computation, vol.5, issue.1, pp.31-62, 2014.
DOI : 10.1080/19462166.2012.661766

M. Thomazo, Compact Rewritings for Existential Rules, IJCAI 2013, Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.1125-1131, 2013.

M. Thomazo and S. Rudolph, Mixing Materialization and Query Rewriting for Existential Rules, ECAI 2014 -21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence Czech Republic -Including Prestigious Applications of Intelligent Systems, pp.18-22, 2014.

H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and J. You, Expressive Completeness of Existential Rule Languages for Ontology-Based Query Answering, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2016, pp.9-15, 2016.