Scenariobased environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France, Agricult. Ecosys. Environ, vol.105, pp.127-144, 2005. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01460814
Environmental impact evaluation of conventional, organic and organic-plus poultry production systems using life cycle assessment, World Poult. Sci. J, vol.66, pp.95-114, 2010. ,
Environmental impacts of plant-based salmonid diets at feed and farm scales, 2011. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01460925
, Aquaculture, vol.321, pp.61-70
Multicriteria fractional model for feed formulation: economic, nutritional and environmental criteria, Agricult. Sys, vol.86, pp.76-96, 2005. ,
, Estimation des rejets d'azote -phos, 2003.
Energy value of wheat dried distillers grains with solubles in roosters, broilers, layers, and turkeys, Poultr. Sci, vol.89, pp.2230-2241, 2010. ,
Energy value of wheat distillers grains with solubles for growing pigs and adult sows, J. Anim. Sci, vol.88, pp.2382-2392, 2010. ,
Comment utiliser les flux, indicateurs et méthodes ACV existants pour traiter l'impact sur la biodiversité. Rapport Final, 2014. ,
, , p.148
Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach, Int. J. Life Cycle Ass, vol.18, pp.1216-1230, 2013. ,
Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: proposal of characterization factors based on functional diversity, Int. J. Life Cycle Ass, vol.18, pp.1231-1242, 2013. ,
Exploring variation in economic, environmental and societal performance among Dutch fattening pig farms, Livest. Sci, vol.149, pp.143-154, 2012. ,
Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment, Animal, vol.8, pp.2027-2037, 2014. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01210763
, , p.1032, 2016.
OVALI : Une méthode d'évaluation de la durabilité des filières avicoles. 2 -Utilisation pour la conception de nouveaux systèmes de production, J. Rech. Avicole et Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, vol.11, pp.881-886, 2015. ,
Environmental Systems Analysis of Pig Production -The Impact of Feed Choice (12pp), Int. J. Life Cycle Assess, vol.10, pp.143-154, 2005. ,
Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes, Ecol. Lett, vol.14, pp.101-112, 2011. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00566627
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector: A Life Cycle Assessment, 2010. ,
Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil, Envir. Conservation, vol.28, pp.23-38, 2001. ,
The impact of various parameters on the carbon footprint of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden, Agricult. Sys, vol.104, pp.459-469, 2011. ,
Solutions for a cultivated planet, Nature, vol.478, pp.337-342, 2011. ,
Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in pig. production using Life Cycle Assessment, Livest. Sci, vol.161, pp.158-175, 2014. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01209165
Impacts environnementaux des aliments porcs -Etat des lieux et possibilité de réduction par le changement de la composition de l'aliment, J. Rech. Porcine, vol.47, pp.99-104, 2015. ,
Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities, Food Agricult. Organization United Nations, 2013. ,
Carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations: impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variations, Animal, vol.8, pp.1329-1338, 2014. ,
, Emissions from livestock and manure management, IPCC guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, p.87, 2006.
Global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA, Int. J. Life Cycle Ass, vol.18, pp.1185-1187, 2013. ,
Carbon fottprints of conventional and organic pork: Assessment of typical production systems in the, Blonk Milieu Advies BV. (Ed). bioKennis, p.93, 2009. ,
Agriculture et biodiversité : des synergies à valoriser, 2008. ,
, Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche et Ministère de l'Ecologie du Développement et de l'Aménagement durables, p.637
Environmental impact of the substitution of imported soybean meal with locally-produced rapeseed meal in dairy cow feed, J. Cleaner Prod, vol.17, pp.616-624, 2009. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00087583
Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: Egg production systems, Poult. Sci, vol.91, pp.26-40, 2012. ,
Towards a methodology to formulate sustainable diets for livestock: accounting for environmental impact in diet formulation, Br. J. Nutr, vol.115, pp.1860-1874, 2016. ,
, Analyse d'un indicateur « biodiversité, MEDDE, p.17, 2013.
Carbon footprint of five pig diets using three land use change accounting methods, Livest. Sci, vol.149, pp.215-223, 2012. ,
Environmental impact of beef by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) -13 Danish beef production systems, p.85, 2015. ,
Effect of feeding strategy on environmental impacts of pig fattening in different contexts of production: evaluation through Life Cycle Assessment, J. Anim. Sci, vol.94, pp.4832-4847, 2016. ,
Effect of pig type, costs and prices, and dietary restraints on dietary nutrient specification for maximum profitability in grower-finisher pig herds: A theoretical approach, Livest. Sci, vol.148, pp.255-267, 2012. ,
Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using, Life Cycle Assessment. Animal, vol.5, pp.1972-1983, 2011. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01461056
Using environmental constraints to formulate low-impact poultry feeds, J. Cleaner Prod, vol.28, pp.215-224, 2012. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01209097
Effects of type of ration and allocation methods on the environmental impacts of beef-production systems, Livest. Sci, vol.145, pp.239-251, 2012. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01209098
Effect of dairy production system, breed and co-product handling methods on environmental impacts at farm level, J. Environ. Manag, vol.120, pp.127-137, 2013. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01209113
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the ruminant suplly chains: A Global Life Cycle Assessment, 2004. ,
, Ambio, vol.33, pp.316-323
Reducing phosphorus concentration in pig diets by adding an environmental objective to the traditional feed formulation algorithm, Livest. Sci, vol.111, pp.16-27, 2007. ,
OVALI : Une méthode d' évaluation de la durabilité des filières avicoles. 1 -Utilisation pour évaluer l' éxistant et identifier des marges de progrès, Avicole et Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, vol.15, pp.1047-1053, 2015. ,
Environmental impacts of French and Brazilian broiler chicken production scenarios: An LCA approach, J. Environ. Manag, vol.133, pp.222-231, 2014. ,
Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses and fish, INRA, p.304, 2004. ,
InraPorc: A model and decision support tool for the nutrition of growing pigs, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol, vol.143, pp.387-405, 2006. ,
Environmental impact of replacing soybean meal with rapeseed meal in diets of finishing pigs, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess, vol.19, pp.1866-1874, 2014. ,
ECOALIM: A dataset of environmental impacts of feed ingredients used in french animal production, PLOS ONE, vol.11, p.167343, 2016. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01595321
, Dans le projet, une méthodologie de formulation multiobjectif a été développée pour produire des éco-aliments à impacts réduits et à prix maitrisé. Les impacts des aliments calculés à la tonne d'aliment sont ainsi modifiés de ? 6 à ? 14 % en production de porcs charcutiers et de + 4 à ? 18 % en poulet de chair selon l'impact considéré, par rapport à une formulation à moindre coût classique et en considérant la disponibilité actuelle des MP. Dans le même temps, le prix de l'aliment est augmenté en moyenne d'1% en porc charcutier et de 3 % en poulet de chair. En biphase, avec restriction en porc charcutier, les impacts du kg de poids vif en sortie de ferme sont alors réduits de ? 2 % à ? 10 %. En poulet de chair, avec une alimentation classique en 3 phases, les impacts du kg de poids vif en sortie de ferme sont quant à eux réduits de ? 2 à ? 14 % (sauf pour l'occupation des terres qui augmente de 3%), Résumé L'alimentation animale peut représenter de 30 à 95 % des impacts environnementaux des produits animaux en sortie de ferme. Des données d'impacts environnementaux des matières premières ont été publiées mais il n'existait pas de données adaptées aux productions françaises
, Feed impacts were modified by ? 6 to ? 14 % in growing pig production and by + 4 % to -18 % in broiler production depending on the impact considered and relative to the lowest cost formulation and current availability of feed ingredients. Simultaneously, feed price was increased by 1 % on average in pig production and 3 % in broiler production. With restricted 2-phase feeding, the impacts of the kilogram of growing pig when leaving the farms were reduced by ? 2 to -10 %. With 3-phase feeding, the impacts of the kilogram of broiler when leaving the farm were reduced by ? 2 to ? 14 % (except for land occupation which was increased by + 3 %)