J. M. Acheson, Institutional Failure in Resource Management, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol.35, issue.1, pp.117-134, 2006.

W. N. Adger, N. W. Arnell, and E. L. Tompkins, Successful Adaptation to Climate Change Across Scales, Global Environmental Change, vol.15, issue.2, pp.77-86, 2005.

A. Agrawal and E. Ostrom, Collective Action, Property Rights, and Decentralization in Resource Use in India and Nepal, Politics & Society, vol.29, issue.4, pp.485-514, 2001.

A. Agrawal, Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources, World Development, vol.29, issue.10, pp.63-71, 2001.

J. M. Anderies, M. A. Janssen, and E. Ostrom, A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective, Ecology and Society, vol.9, issue.1, pp.1-18, 2004.

N. B. Ban, L. S. Evans, M. Nenadovic, and M. Schoon, Interplay of Multiple Goods, Ecosystem Services, and Property Rights in Large Social-Ecological Marine Protected Areas, Ecology and Society, vol.20, issue.4, 2015.

M. Barnes-mauthe, S. A. Gray, S. Arita, J. Lynham, and P. S. Leung, What Determines Social Capital in a Social-Ecological System? Insights from a Network Perspective, Environmental Management, vol.55, issue.2, pp.392-410, 2015.

M. Bavinck and A. Jyotishi, Introduction: The Legal Pluralism Perspective, Conflict, Negotiations and Natural Resource Management: A Legal Pluralism Perspective from India, 2014.

M. Bavinck and J. Gupta, Legal Pluralism in Aquatic Regimes: A Challenge for Governance, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol.11, pp.78-85, 2014.

F. Berkes, Cross Scale Institutional Linkages: Perspectives from the Bottom Up, Drama of the Commons, 2002.

N. D. Brunet, G. M. Hickey, and M. M. Humphries, Understanding Community-Researcher Partnerships in the Natural Sciences: A Case Study from the Arctic, Journal of Rural Studies, vol.36, pp.247-261, 2014.

R. S. Burt, The Network Structure of Social Capital, Research in Organizational Behavior, vol.22, pp.345-423, 2000.

R. S. Burt, Bridge Decay. Social Networks, vol.24, issue.4, pp.333-363, 2002.

R. S. Burt, Structural Holes and Good Ideas, The American Journal of Sociology, vol.110, issue.2, pp.349-399, 2004.

L. Carlsson and F. Berkes, Co-management: Concepts and Methodological Implications, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.75, issue.1, pp.65-76, 2005.

D. W. Cash, In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information': Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations, Technology & Human Values, vol.26, issue.4, pp.431-453, 2001.

D. W. Cash, W. N. Adger, F. Berkes, P. Garden, L. Lebel et al., Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World, Ecology and Society, vol.11, issue.2, 2006.

E. Challies, J. Newig, and A. Lenschow, What Role for Social-Ecological Systems Research in Governing Global Teleconnections?, Global Environmental Change, vol.27, pp.32-40, 2014.

M. Cote and A. J. Nightingale, Resilience Thinking Meets Social Theory Situating Social Change in Socio-Ecological Systems (SES) Research, Progress in Human Geography, vol.36, issue.4, pp.475-489, 2012.

H. M. Tuihedur-rahman,

J. Drèze and A. Sen, India Development and Participation, 2002.

T. Dietz, E. Ostrom, and P. C. Stern, The Struggle to Govern the Commons, Science, vol.302, issue.5652, pp.1907-1912, 2003.

K. M. Eisenhardt, Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, vol.14, issue.4, pp.532-550, 1989.

G. Epstein, J. Pittman, S. M. Alexander, S. Berdej, T. Dyck et al., Institutional Fit and the Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol.14, pp.34-40, 2015.

J. A. Everingham, Australia's Regions: Congested Governance or Institutional Void?, Public Policy and Administration, vol.24, issue.1, pp.84-102, 2009.

C. Folke, T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg, Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol.30, issue.1, pp.441-473, 2005.

A. S. Garmestani and M. H. Benson, A Framework for Resilience-Based Governance of Social-Ecological Systems, Ecology and Society, vol.18, issue.1, p.9, 2013.

C. C. Gibson, Pursuit of Better Policy Outcomes, vol.57, pp.227-230, 2005.

C. C. Gibson, E. Ostrom, and T. K. Ahn, Ottawa: Aboriginal and Northern Affairs Canada. Government of the Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation Constitution. Old Crow, vol.32, issue.2, pp.217-239, 2000.

M. Granovetter, The Strength of Weak Ties, The American Journal of Sociology, vol.78, issue.6, pp.1360-1380, 1973.

W. J. Grigsby, Subsistence and Land Tenure in the Sahel, Agriculture and Human Values, vol.19, issue.2, pp.151-164, 2002.

K. Hagedorn, Natural Resource Management: The Role of Cooperative Institutions and Governance, Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, vol.2, issue.1, pp.101-121, 2013.

M. Hajer, Policy Without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void, Policy Sciences, vol.36, issue.2, pp.175-195, 2003.

M. Hajer, Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization, 2009.

, A framework for analyzing institutional gaps in natural resource governance 849

G. Helmke and S. Levitsky, Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, vol.2, issue.4, pp.725-740, 2004.

R. Heltberg, Property Rights and Natural Resource Management in Developing Countries, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol.16, issue.2, pp.189-214, 2002.

J. M. Hodge, Colonial Experts, Developmental and Environmental Doctrines, and the Legacies of Late British Colonialism, Cultivating the Colonies: Colonial States and Their Environmental Legacies, 2011.

D. Huitema, E. Mostert, W. Egas, S. Moellenkamp, C. Pahl-wostl et al., Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (co-) Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda, Ecology and Society, vol.14, issue.1, p.26, 2009.

J. Huther and A. Shah, Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralization, 1998.

M. T. Imperial, Institutional Analysis and Ecosystem-Based Management: The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework, Environmental Management, vol.24, issue.4, pp.449-465, 1999.

Y. Jhala, Q. Qureshi, and R. Gopal, Can the Abundance of Tigers Be Assessed from Their Signs, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol.48, issue.1, pp.14-24, 2011.

L. L. Kiser and E. Ostrom, The Three Worlds of Action: A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches, Polycentric Games and Institutions: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, 2000.

G. P. Kofinas, The Costs of Power Sharing: Community Involvement in Canadian Porcupine Caribou Co-management, 1998.

G. P. Kofinas, Caribou Hunters and Researchers at the Interface: Emergent of and the Dynamics Dilemmas in Power Sharing Legitimacy, Anthropologica, vol.47, issue.2, pp.179-196, 2005.

A. Krishna, Gaining Access to Public Services and the Democratic State in India: Institutions in the Middle, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol.46, issue.1, pp.98-117, 2011.

A. Krishna, Active Social Capital: Tracing the Roots of Development and Democracy, 2002.

M. D. Mcginnis and E. Ostrom, Social-Ecological System Framework: Initial Changes and Continuing Challenges, Ecology and Society, vol.19, issue.2, p.30, 2014.

R. S. Meinzen-dick and R. Pradhan, Implications of Legal Pluralism for Natural Resource Management, IDS Bulletin, vol.32, issue.4, pp.10-17, 2001.

S. E. Merry, Legal pluralism, Law & Society Review, vol.22, issue.5, pp.869-896, 1988.

M. Mills, R. L. Pressey, R. Weeks, S. Foale, and N. C. Ban, A Mismatch of Scales: Challenges in Planning for Implementation of Marine Protected Areas in the Coral Triangle, Conservation Letters, vol.3, issue.5, pp.291-303, 2010.

S. K. Mincey, M. Hutten, B. C. Fischer, T. P. Evans, S. I. Stewart et al., Structuring Institutional Analysis for Urban Ecosystems: A Key to Sustainable Urban Forest Management, Urban Ecosystems, vol.16, issue.3, pp.553-571, 2013.

P. Nadasdy, The Politics of TEK: Pover and the 'Integration' of Knowledge, Arctic Anthropology, vol.36, issue.1-2, pp.1-18, 1999.

D. C. North, Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.5, issue.1, pp.97-112, 1991.

E. Ostrom, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, 1990.

E. Ostrom, Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development, World Development, vol.24, issue.6, pp.1073-1087, 1996.

E. Ostrom, A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.104, issue.39, pp.15181-15187, 2007.

E. Ostrom, A Long Polycentric Journey, Annual Review of Political Science, vol.13, issue.1, pp.1-23, 2010.

E. Ostrom, Background on the Institutional Analysis and, Policy Studies Journal, vol.39, issue.1, pp.7-27, 2011.

E. Ostrom, A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems, Science, vol.325, issue.5939, pp.419-422, 2009.

E. Ostrom, R. Gardner, and J. Walker, Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources, 1994.

E. Ostrom and E. Schlager, The Formation of Property Rights. In Rights to Nature: Ecological, Economic, Cultural, and Political Principles of Institutions for the Environment, 1996.

V. Ostrom, C. M. Tiebout, and R. Warren, The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry, The American Political Science Review, vol.55, issue.4, pp.831-842, 1961.

E. Padilla and G. P. Kofinas, Letting the Leaders Pass': Barriers to Using Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Comanagement as the Basis of Formal Hunting Regulations, Ecology and Society, vol.19, issue.2, 2014.

C. Pahl-wostl, A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes, Global Environmental Change, vol.19, pp.354-365, 2009.

S. Partelow and K. J. Winkler, Interlinking Ecosystem Services and Ostrom's Framework Through Orientation in Sustainability Research, Ecology and Society, vol.21, issue.3, p.27, 2016.

A. Poteete, Levels, Scales, Linkages, and Other 'Multiples' affecting Natural Resources, International Journal of the Commons, vol.6, issue.2, pp.134-150, 2012.

H. M. Rahman, G. M. Hickey, and S. K. Sarker, Examining the Role of Social Capital in Community Collective Action for Sustainable Wetland Fisheries in Bangladesh, Wetlands, vol.35, issue.3, pp.487-499, 2015.

H. M. Rahman, G. M. Hickey, and S. K. Sarker, A Framework for Evaluating Collective Action and Informal Institutional Dynamics Under a Resource Management Policy of Decentralization, Ecological Economics, vol.83, pp.32-41, 2012.

H. M. Rahman, S. K. Sarker, G. M. Hickey, M. M. Haque, and N. Das, Informal Institutional Responses to Government Interventions: Lessons from Madhupur National Park, Bangladesh. Environmental Management, vol.54, issue.5, pp.1175-1189, 2014.

A. Rastogi, G. M. Hickey, R. Badola, and S. A. Hussain, Understanding the Local Socio-Political Processes Affecting Conservation Management Outcomes in Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. Environmental Management, vol.53, issue.5, pp.913-929, 2014.

J. C. Ribot, African Decentralization: Local Actors, Powers and Accountability, 2002.

J. C. Ribot, Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources. In Beyond Structural Adjustment The Institutional Context of African Development, 2003.

A. Sandberg, Property Rights and Ecosystem Properties, Land Use Policy, vol.24, issue.4, pp.613-623, 2007.

E. Schlager and E. Ostrom, Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis, Land Economics, vol.68, issue.3, pp.249-262, 1992.

N. U. Sekhar, Crop and Livestock Depredation Caused by Wild Animals in Protected Areas: The Case of Sariska Tiger Reserve, Environmental Conservation, vol.25, issue.2, pp.160-171, 1998.

P. Smoke and B. D. Lewis, Fiscal Decentralization in Indonesia: A New Approach to an Old Idea, World Development, vol.24, issue.8, pp.1281-1299, 1996.

C. S. Sokile, J. J. Kashaigili, and R. M. Kadigi, Towards an Integrated Water Resource Management in Tanzania: The Role of Appropriate Institutional Framework in Rufiji Basin, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, vol.28, pp.1015-1023, 2003.

A. M. Song, Governance in Transition: Exploring People's Mindset and Institutional Matches Towards a Governable Coastal Fisheries in South Korea, 2014.

R. Stavenhagen, General Considerations on the Situation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous Peoples in Asia. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Sixth session, pp.14-25, 2007.

V. Benda-beckmann and F. , Who's Afraid of Legal Pluralism?, The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, vol.34, issue.47, pp.37-82, 2002.

O. Young, Annex 1: Glossary Action: moves or decisions taken by a player in the game. For example, an action in tennis would include either defending the baseline or charging the net. Action taken without any rule guidance is a violation at all rule levels, Ecology and Society, vol.11, issue.1, p.27, 2000.

, Non-constitutional action: comprises operational choice actions (first level) and collective choice actions

, Operational choice actions: "individuals are authorized to take a wide variety of actions at this level without prior arrangements with other individuals, vol.76, 2000.

, In the case of MNP, the new roles and actions of new leaders in land right transactions on behalf of the community is an example of collective choice action under an informal institution (see Case study #2)

, For example, the authority to institute an annual "closed season" through A framework for analyzing institutional gaps in natural resource governance 853 temporal closure of crab fishing activities even by licensed harvesters under the formal constitutional rules of the South Korean government is a constitutional action, Constitutional action (third level action): individuals are authorized to make rules governing collective actions and future decision making, 2000.

, Institutions: rules of the game which is used by individuals to guide their actions and decisions, 1991.

, Formal institutions: as a de jure body of rulemaking and enforcement in a hierarchical organizational structure, usually accompanied by codified norms of behavior and bureaucratic polity, 1991.

, Informal institutions: a rule system that largely lacks official codification, and thus typically comprises habitual, verbalized, or customary rules, codes, and conducts, which function as the de facto rulemaking and enforcement body, 1991.

, Polycentric: different centers of decision-making which are formally independent of each other, 1961.

, Rule: a coercion mechanism that prompts a decision by directing whether an action is allowed or not allowed

. Based-on-ostrom, s multi-level rule hierarchy, where institutions are arranged into three layers of 'rules-in-use': operational choice, collective choice, and constitutional choice rules, 1994.