F. Bareille and M. Zavalloni, Decentralisation of agri-environmental policy design, European Review of Agricultural Economics, pp.1-29, 2020.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02629239

, Decentralisation of agri-environmental policy design

E. Ahmad, Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, 2006.

H. Arends, More with less? Fiscal decentralisation, public health spending and health sector performance, Swiss Political Science Review, vol.23, pp.144-174, 2017.

F. Bareille, J. Couzier, and P. Dupraz, Delivrable D4.2.-Report on Valuation Results: Demand-side Valuation Results-Annex 4-PROVIDE H2020 Project "PRO-VIding Smart DElivery of Public Goods by EU Agriculture and Forestry, 2017.

S. Barrett, Self-enforcing international environmental agreements, Oxford Economic Papers New Series, vol.46, pp.878-894, 1994.

V. Beckmann, J. Eggers, and E. Mettepenningen, Deciding how to decide on agrienvironmental schemes: the political economy of subsidiarity, decentralisation and participation in the European Union, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol.52, pp.689-716, 2009.

A. Benassy-quere, N. Gobalraja, and A. Trannoy, Tax and public input competition, Economic Policy, vol.22, pp.386-430, 2007.

T. Besley and S. Coate, Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: a political economy approach, Journal of Public Economics, vol.87, pp.2611-2637, 2003.

D. Bougherara and C. Gaigné, On the efficiency of decentralized conservation policy. In: Is Decentralization of Agri-Environmental Policy Welfare Enhancing? Program for Environmental and Resource Economics Seminar, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01462407

M. R. Busemeyer, The impact of fiscal decentralisation on education and other types of spending, Swiss Political Science Review, vol.14, pp.451-481, 2008.

J. Cavailhès and P. Wavresky, Urban influences on periurban farmland prices, European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol.30, pp.333-357, 2003.

J. Crémer, A. Estache, and P. Seabright, Decentralizing public services: what can we learn from the theory of the firm?, Revue d'Economie Politique, vol.106, pp.37-60, 1996.

M. Czajkowski, W. Budzi?ski, and D. Campbell, Spatial heterogeneity of willingness to pay for forest management, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.68, pp.705-727, 2017.

N. Droste, C. Becker, and I. Ring, Decentralization effects in ecological fiscal transfers: a Bayesian structural time series analysis for Portugal, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.71, pp.1027-1051, 2018.

D. Epple and T. Nechyba, Fiscal decentralization, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol.4, pp.2423-2480, 2004.

, Is Agri-environmental support well designed and managed, European Court of Auditors. Special Report, issue.7, 2011.

K. Falconer, P. Dupraz, and M. Whitby, An investigation of policy administrative costs using panel data for the English environmentally sensitive areas, Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.52, pp.83-103, 2001.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01931678

G. Gilbert and P. Picard, Incentives and optimal size of local jurisdictions, European Economic Review, vol.40, pp.19-41, 1996.

, , 2020.

, Version postprint Comment citer ce document

F. Bareille and M. Zavalloni, Decentralisation of agri-environmental policy design, European Review of Agricultural Economics, pp.1-29, 2020.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02629239

F. Bareille, M. Zavalloni-gómez-limón, J. A. Gutiérrez-martín, C. Villanueva, and A. J. , Optimal design of agri-environmental schemes under asymmetric information for improving farmland biodiversity, Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.70, pp.153-177, 2019.

B. Harstad and T. K. Mideksa, Conservation contracts and political regimes, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.84, pp.1708-1734, 2017.

R. P. Inman, Transfers and bailouts: enforcing local fiscal discipline with lessons from US federalism, Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints, pp.45-47, 2003.

R. J. Johnston and M. Ramachandran, Modeling spatial patchiness and hot spots in stated preference willingness to pay, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.59, pp.363-387, 2014.

S. Kumar and S. Managi, Compensation for environmental services and intergovernmental fiscal transfers: the case of India, Ecological Economics, vol.68, pp.3052-3059, 2009.

A. Langlais, L'agriculture et les paiements pour services environnementaux. Quels questionnements juridiques?, p.447, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02051821

U. Latacz-lohmann and C. Van-der-hamsvoort, Auctioning conservation contracts: a theoretical analysis and an application, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.79, pp.407-418, 1997.

C. Lessmann and G. Markwardt, One size fits all? Decentralization, corruption, and the monitoring of bureaucrats, World Development, vol.38, pp.631-646, 2010.

I. Logar and R. Brouwer, Substitution effects and spatial preference heterogeneity in single-and multiple-site choice experiments, Land Economics, vol.94, pp.302-322, 2018.

E. Mettepenningen, A. Verspecht, and G. Van-huylenbroeck, Measuring private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol.52, pp.649-667, 2009.

E. Mettepenningen, V. Beckmann, and J. Eggers, Public transaction costs of agrienvironmental schemes and their determinants-analysing stakeholders' involvement and perceptions, Ecological Economics, vol.70, pp.641-650, 2011.

W. E. Oates, A Reconsideration of Environmental Federalism, 2001.

W. E. Oates, An essay on fiscal federalism, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.37, pp.1120-1149, 1999.

W. E. Oates, Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism, International Tax and Public Finance, vol.12, pp.349-373, 2005.

W. E. Oates, Public Goods and Externalities Agri-environmental Policy Measures in Selected OECD Countries, Fiscal Federalism. Cheltenha, 1972.

M. J. Olson, The principle of "fiscal equivalence": the division of responsibilities among different levels of government, American Economic Review, vol.59, pp.479-487, 1969.

J. Pate and J. Loomis, The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California, Ecological Economics, vol.20, pp.199-207, 1997.

G. Perino and O. Talavera, The benefits of spatially differentiated regulation: the response to acid rain by US states prior to the acid rain program, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.96, pp.108-123, 2013.

I. Ring, Integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers: the case of the ecological ICMS in Brazil, Land use policy, vol.25, issue.4, pp.485-497, 2008.

, , 2020.

, Version postprint Comment citer ce document

F. Bareille and M. Zavalloni, Decentralisation of agri-environmental policy design, European Review of Agricultural Economics, pp.1-29, 2020.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02629239

, Decentralisation of agri-environmental policy design 25

H. Sigman, Decentralization and environmental quality: an international analysis of water pollution levels and variation, Land Economics, vol.90, pp.114-130, 2014.

C. M. Tiebout, A pure theory of local expenditures, Journal of Political Economy, vol.64, pp.416-424, 1956.

C. M. Tiebout and D. B. Houston, Metropolitan finance reconsidered: budget functions and multi-level governments, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.44, pp.412-417, 1962.

A. Weber, Implementing EU co-financed agri-environmental schemes: effects on administrative transaction costs in a regional grassland extensification scheme, Land Use Policy, vol.42, pp.183-193, 2015.

F. Bareille and M. Zavalloni, Decentralisation of agri-environmental policy design, European Review of Agricultural Economics, pp.1-29, 2020.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02629239

, Decentralisation of agri-environmental policy design 29