G. Mendel, The origin of genetics. A Mendel so ur ce bo ok, pp.1-48, 1966.

T. A. Sved and O. Mayo, The evolution of domi nance. r n: Kojlma KI, Ma thematicaltojJics in populatio n g enetics, pp.289-292, 1970.

V. Nanjundiah, Why are most mutations recessive ?, Genet, vol.72, pp.85-97, 1993.

. Mayo-0 and R. Bürger, The evolution of do minance : a theOI)' whose time has passed?, Bio l Rcu, vol.72, pp.97-110, 1997.

D. Bourguet, The evolution of dominan ce, Hereilily, vol.83, pp.1-4, 1999.

R. Falk, The rise and fall of dominance, Bi ol Phi lo s, vol.16, pp.285-323, 2001.

R. A. Fisher, The possible modification of the response of the wild ty pe to recurrent mutations, Am Na t, vol.62, pp.115-141, 1928.

R. A. Fisher, Two further notes on the ori gin of dominance, Am Na t, vol.62, pp.571-575, 1928.

R. A. Fisher, Professor Wri g ht on the theo ry of dominance, Am Na t, vol.1, issue.34, pp.370-374

S. Wright, Fisher's theory of dominance, Am Na t, vol.63, pp.274-283, 1929.

. Il and . Provine, Sewall Wri g ht and Evo lutio na ry Bi olo gy, 1986.

M. W. Feldman and S. Karlin, The evolution of dominance : a direct approach through the theory of linka g e and selection, TheoT Pop Biol, vol.2, pp.48-50, 1971.

S. Karlin and M. , Towards a theory of the evolution 01 modifier genes, TheoT Pop Biol, vol.5, pp.59-60, 1974.

W. F. Bodmer and P. A. Parsons, Linkage and recombination in evolution, Adv Genet, vol.11, pp.1-100, 1962.

?. Ewens, A note on Fisher's theory of the evolution of dominance, Ann Hum Genet, vol.29, pp.85-93, 1965.

?. Ewens, Linkage and the evolution of dominance, Heredity, vol.21, pp.363-70, 1966.

S. Wlight, The evolution of dominance

D. Comment-on, Fisher's reply, Am Nat, vol.63, pp.556-61, 1929.

J. L. Crosby, The evolution and nature of dominance, J Theor Biol, vol.5, pp.35-40, 1963.

. Rough, Theory of Population Ge netics and Evolutionary Ecology : and fntmduc tion (chapter Evolution of the g enetic sys tem), 1979.

M. J. Simmons and T. F. Craw, Mutations affec-. ting fitJ1ess in Drosophi[â populations, Ann R el ! Genet, vol.11, pp.49-78, 1977.

B. Charlcsworth, Evidence against Fi sher's theOl)' of dominance, Nature, vol.278, pp.848-857, 1979.

H. A. Orr, A test of Fisher's theory of do minance, Proc Natl Acad Sci, vol.88, pp.114-127, 1991.

S. Wright, Physiological and evolutionary theories of dominance, Am Nat, vol.68, pp.24-53, 1934.

H. Kacser and . Burnsja, The molecular basis of dominance, Genetics, vol.198, issue.1, pp.639-66

P. D. Keightley, A metabolic basis fo r do minance and recessivity, Genetics, vol.143, pp.621-626, 1996.

A. Cornish-bowden, Dominance is not inevitable, Theor Biol, vol.125, pp.335-343, 1987.

M. A. Savageau and A. Sorribas, Constraints among molecular and systematics proper ties : im p lications for physiological genetics, Theor Biol, vol.141, pp.93-94, 1989.

. Sava-g-eau and . Ma, Dominance according Lü metabo\tc contraI analysis major achieve ment or house of cards ?, J 17wor Biol, vol.154, pp.131-137, 1992.

U. Grossniklaus and M. S. Madhusudhan, Nan jundiah V. Nonlinear enzyme kinetics can lead to high metabolic flux control coeffi cient : implications for the evolution of do minance, Theor Bio1 l996, vol.182, pp.299-302

, Haldane JBS. A note on Fisher's theory of the origin of dominance, and on a corre lation between dominance and linkage, Am Nat, vol.64, pp.87-90, 1930.

L. D. Hurst and J. P. Randerson, Dosage, dele tions and dominance : simple models of the evolution . of gene expression, Theor Biol, vol.205, pp.641-648, 2000.

D. R. Forsdyke, The heat-shock response and the molecular basis of genetic domi nance, Theor Biol, vol.167, pp.1-5, 1994.

, Sorne contributions to populatIOn genetics resulting fr om the stu dy of Lepidoptera, Adv Genet, vol.10, pp.165-216, 1961.

, PM. Na tural selection and her? dIt y, 1975.

E. B. Ford, The theory of dominance, Am Nat, vol.64, pp.560-566, 1940.

R. A. Fisher and S. B. Holt, The ex p erimental modification of dominance in Danforth ' s short-tailed mutant mice, Ann Eugen, vol.12, pp.102-122, 1944.

R. H. Ffrench-constant, B. Pittendrigh, A. Vaughan, and N. Anthony, Why are there so few resistance-associated mutations in insec ticide . tar g ? t g enes ? Ph il Tra ns R Soc Lond B, pp.353-1685, 1998.

D. Bourguet and M. Raymond, The molecular basis of dominance relation ships : the case of sorne recent adaptive genes, Evol Biol, vol.Il, pp.103-125, 1998.

V. Rupes and P. , Genetic analysis of resistance to DDT, meihoxychlor and fe no tration in two strains of housefly (Musca do mestica), Entomol Exp Appl, vol.18, pp.480-489, 1975.

A. Grigolo, The impor tance of DDT-dehydrochlorinase for the ef fect of the resistance gene kdr in the house fly Musca domestica, Genetica, vol.37, pp.159-70, 1966.

H. Kettlewell, Insect survival and se lection for pattern, Science, vol.148, pp.1290-1296, 1965.

C. A. Clarke and P. M. Sheppard, The evolution of dominance under disruptive selection, Heredity, vol.14, pp.73-87, 1960.

R. Bürger, Dynamics of the classical ge netic model for the evolution of dominan ce, Mathem Biosci, vol.67, pp.125-168, 1983.

R. Bürger, On the evolution of dominan ce modlfiers 1. A nonlinear analysis, J 17wor Biol, vol.101, pp.585-98, 1983.

, Bürger R. Nonlinear anal y sis of sorne models for the evolution of dominance, p.45

, Mathem Bio1, vol.16, pp.269-80

J. Haldane, The theo ry of selection for mela ? ism in Le p idoptera, Pr oc R Soc Land B, pp.145-303, 1956.

B. Wallace, Tapics in population genetics (cha p ter The evolution of dominance), 1968.

D. Charlesworth and B. Charlesworth, Theo retical genetics of Batesian mimi c ry III. The evolution of dominance, Theor Biol, vol.55, pp.325-362, 1975.

S. P. Otto and D. Bourguet, Balanced poly mor p hism and the evolution of dominance, Am Na t, vol.153, pp.561-74, 1999.

R. A. Fisher, On the dominance ratio, Proc R Soc Edinburgh, vol.42, pp.321-362, 1922.

H. Levene, Genetic e q uilibrium when more than one ecolo g ical I1lche is available, Am Nat, vol.87, pp.33-36, 1953.

E. R. Dempster, Maintenance of genetic hetero g eneity. Cold Spri ng Harbor Sy mp Quant Bio1 l955, vol.20, pp.25-32

R. F. Hoekstra, R. Bijlsma, and A. J. Dolman, Po lymorphism fr om environmental heteroge neity : models are only robust if the hetero zygote is close in fitness to the favored hom ? zy g ote in each environment, Genet Res, vol.45, pp.299-302, 1985.

J. Hodgkin, Fluxes, doses and poisons : molecular p ers p ectives on dominance, Trends, vol.9, pp.1-2, 1993.

A. Wilkie, The molecular basis of g e netic dominance, Med Genet, vol.31, pp.89-98, 1994.

J. Hodgkin, A. Papp, R. Pulak, A. V. Anderson, and P. , A new kind of informational suppression in the nematode Ceanorhabditis elegans, Genetics, vol.123, pp.301-314, 1989.

]. W. Porteous, Dominance-One hundred and fifteen y ears after Mendel's paper, Th eOT Biol, vol.182, pp.223-255, 1996.

S. Wright, The fa ctors of the albino se ries of g uinea pigs and their effects on black and y ellow pigmentation, Genetics, vol.10, pp.223-60, 1925.

T. H. Morgan, C. B. Bridges, and A. H. Sturtevant, The genetics of Drosophila, Bibliographia Ge netica, vol.2, pp.1-262, 1925.

L. C. Dunn, Changes of dominance in the house mouse, Genetlcs, vol.25, p.116, 1940.