Comparing methods for joint objective and subjective uncertainty propagation with an example in a risk assessment - INRAE - Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2005

Comparing methods for joint objective and subjective uncertainty propagation with an example in a risk assessment

Résumé

Probability-boxes, numerical possibility theory and belief functions have been suggested as useful tools to represent imprecise, vague or incomplete information. They are particularly appropriate in environmental risk assessment where information is typically tainted with imprecision or incompleteness. Based on these notions, we present and compare four different methods to propagate objective and subjective uncertainties through multivariate functions. Lastly, we use these different techniques on an environmental real case of soil contamination by lead on an ironworks brownfield.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-02762544 , version 1 (04-06-2020)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-02762544 , version 1
  • PRODINRA : 479464

Citer

Cédric Baudrit, Didier Dubois. Comparing methods for joint objective and subjective uncertainty propagation with an example in a risk assessment. 4th International Symposium On Imprecise Probability: Theories And Applications (ISIPTA 2005), 2005, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. ⟨hal-02762544⟩
25 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More