C. Francis, G. Lieblein, S. Gliessman, T. A. Breland, N. Creamer et al., Agroecology: The ecology of food systems, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, vol.22, issue.3, pp.99-118, 2003.

J. N. Galloway, J. D. Aber, J. W. Erisman, S. P. Seitzinger, R. W. Howarth et al., The Nitrogen Cascade, BioScience, vol.53, issue.4, pp.341-356, 2003.

J. N. Galloway, A. R. Townsend, J. W. Erisman, M. Bekunda, Z. G. Cai et al., Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions, Science, vol.320, issue.5878, pp.889-892, 2008.

K. Garbach, J. C. Milder, F. A. Declerck, M. Montenegro-de-wit, L. Driscoll et al., Examining multi-functionality for crop yield and ecosystem services in five systems of agroecological intensification, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, pp.1-22, 2016.

,

T. Garnett, Food sustainability: problems, perspectives and solutions, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol.72, issue.1, pp.29-39, 2013.

F. W. Geels, Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.72, issue.6, pp.681-696, 2005.

R. N. German, C. E. Thompson, and T. G. Benton, Relationships among multiple aspects of agriculture's environmental impact and productivity: a meta-analysis to guide sustainable agriculture, Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2016.

A. Gibon, Managing grassland for production, the environment and the landscape. Challenges at the farm and the landscape level, Livestock Production Science, vol.96, issue.1, pp.11-31, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02678475

,

C. Ginane, R. Baumont, J. Lassalas, and M. Petit, Feeding behaviour and intake of heifers fed on hays of various quality, offered alone or in a choice situation, Animal Research, vol.51, issue.3, pp.177-188, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00889849

S. R. Gliessman, Agroecology: Researching the Ecological Basis for Sustainable Agriculture, pp.3-10, 1990.

S. R. Gliessman, Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food systems, pp.269-285, 2007.

H. C. Godfray, J. R. Beddington, I. R. Crute, L. Haddad, D. Lawrence et al., Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People, Science, vol.327, issue.5967, pp.812-818, 2010.

A. Grêt-regamey, B. Weibel, K. J. Bagstad, M. Ferrari, D. Geneletti et al., On the Effects of Scale for Ecosystem Services Mapping, Plos One, vol.9, issue.12, p.112601, 2015.

H. Guyomard, B. Darcy-vrillon, C. Esnouf, M. Marin, M. Russel et al., Eating patterns and food systems: critical knowledge requirements for policy design and implementation, Agriculture & Food Security, vol.1, issue.1, pp.1-21, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02648055

V. Maris, Nature à vendre. Les limites des services écosystémiques. Editions Quae (Sciences en questions), vol.96, 2014.

T. Marsden, Towards a Real Sustainable Agri-food Security and Food Policy: Beyond the Ecological Fallacies? The Political Quarterly, vol.83, pp.139-145, 2012.

T. Marsden, From post-productionism to reflexive governance: Contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures, Journal of Rural Studies, vol.29, pp.123-134, 2013.

G. R. Marshall, A social-ecological systems framework for food systems research: accommodating transformation systems and their products, International Journal of the Commons, vol.9, issue.2, pp.881-908, 2015.

M. D. Mcginnis and E. Ostrom, Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges, Ecology and Society, vol.19, issue.2, 2014.

, Rapport de synthèse de l'Évaluation des Écosystèmes pour le Millénaire 59 p, 2005.

C. A. Monteiro, J. C. Moubarac, G. Cannon, S. W. Ng, and B. Popkin, Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system, Obesity Reviews, vol.14, pp.21-28, 2013.

M. Moraine, M. Duru, P. Nicholas, P. Leterme, and O. Therond, Farming system design for innovative croplivestock integration in Europe, Animal, vol.8, issue.8, pp.1204-1217, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01209211

M. Moraine, M. Duru, and O. Therond, A social-ecological framework for analyzing and designing integrated crop-livestock systems from farm to territory levels. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, pp.1-14, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01602520

J. E. Morrissey, M. Mirosa, and M. Abbott, Identifying Transition Capacity for Agri-food Regimes: Application of the Multi-level Perspective for Strategic Mapping, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, vol.16, issue.2, pp.281-301, 2014.

B. Muller and D. Kreuer, Ecologists Should Care about Insurance, too, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.31, issue.1, pp.1-2, 2016.

B. H. Walker, L. H. Gunderson, A. P. Kinzig, C. Folke, S. R. Carpenter et al., A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems, Ecology and Society, issue.1, p.11, 2006.

K. Warner, Agroecology in Action: Social Networks Extending Alternative Agriculture, p.304, 2007.

H. Westhoek, J. P. Lesschen, A. Leip, T. Rood, S. Wagner et al., Nitrogen on the table: the influence of food choices on nitrogen emissions and the European environment, NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, vol.66, 2015.

A. Wezel, S. Bellon, T. Doré, C. Francis, D. Vallod et al., Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol.29, pp.503-515, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00886499

A. Wezel, H. Brives, M. Casagrande, C. Clément, A. Dufour et al., Agroecology territories: places for sustainable agricultural and food systems and biodiversity conservation. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, vol.40, pp.132-144, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02088992

C. S. Yip, G. Crane, and J. Karnon, Systematic review of reducing population meat consumption to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and obtain health benefits: effectiveness and models assessments, International Journal of Public Health, vol.58, issue.5, pp.683-693, 2013.

W. Zhang, T. H. Ricketts, C. Kremen, K. Carney, and S. M. Swinton, Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture, Ecological Economics, vol.64, issue.2, pp.253-260, 2007.

L. Limites, ACV est donc d'un outil puissant d'analyse environnementale, mais qui comporte plusieurs écueils : ? Celui de la complétude : il manque encore un certain nombre de catégories d'impact opérationnelles, comme la biodiversité

, Celui de l'interprétation et de la prise de décision : la multiplicité des indicateurs (surtout s'ils ne vont pas dans le même sens) rend difficilement compréhensible le diagnostic et complique la prise de décision

?. Le and . Nguyen, Néanmoins, la valeur économique des différents coproduits, censée représenter leur intérêt pour le producteur et la société, est régulièrement utilisée (Ardente and Cellura, des règles d'allocation dans les systèmes agricoles ne fait pas consensus, 2003.

T. Pelletier and . Loiseau, pouvant induire de la lourdeur dans la mise en oeuvre. La qualité et la complétude des données deviennent alors un critère fondamental dans la précision du résultat de l'ACV. Les perspectives d'évolution de l'ACV en agriculture sont nombreuses. Il s'agit de poursuivre l'adaptation de méthodes de calcul pertinentes au cadre de l'ACV, pour mieux prendre en compte les spécificités du monde biologique, le devenir des émissions polluantes, la sensibilité des milieux aux impacts, développer des approches spatialisées, Les différentes règles d'allocation ne donnant pas les mêmes niveaux d'impacts entre les coproduits ? Un des points particuliers des ACV est la mobilisation d'un nombre de données très important et de natures ou d'origines très diverses, 2011.

. Nguyen, Il existe une variante dite ACV conséquentielle qui permet d'évaluer les impacts d'une décision sur les processus affectés par cette décision. Il s'agit par exemple, quand on étudie les changements de pratiques d'alimentation des animaux, d'évaluer les modifications des impacts associés aux changements d'assolement dans les cultures, et aux modifications de l'offre et de la demande sur les marchés internationaux, 2013.

. Vazquez-rowe,

, Elle s'appuie sur un nombre d'hypothèses encore supérieur à l'ACV attributionnelle classique

. Paoli, Elle est appelée « Emergy solaire » et s'exprime en joules d'Emergy solaire dont l'abréviation est «sej» pour solar emjoule. Les transformités (ou coefficients de transformation) estiment la quantité d'Emergy (en sej) requise directement ou indirectement pour produire une unité d'un bien ou d'un service, Emergy L'agriculture mobilise une combinaison d'intrants provenant du capital naturel (sol, énergie solaire, pluie, ressources énergétiques fossiles) et d'intrants provenant du capital créé par l'homme (engrais, semences, pesticides) pour générer ses produits. La méthode ACV ne considère que les intrants du capital créé par l'homme et les ressources énergétiques fossiles, 2001.

, La méthode Emergy utilise aussi des diagrammes spécifiques pour représenter les systèmes de production et leurs flux associés. Un ensemble de symboles représentent

G. Allaire and T. Dupeuble, De la multifonctionnalité à la multi-évaluation de l'activité agricole, Économie rurale, vol.275, pp.51-65, 2003.

L. Amblard and C. Mann, Ex-ante institutional compatibility assessment of policy options: methodological insights from a case study on the Nitrate Directive, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol.54, issue.5, pp.661-684, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00958267

F. Ardente and M. Cellura, Economic Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment The State of the Art and Discussion of Examples, Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol.16, issue.3, pp.387-398, 2012.

J. P. Aubin, Viability Theory, vol.543, 1991.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00636570

S. Bastianoni, N. Marchettini, M. Panzieri, and E. Tiezzi, Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area (Italy), Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.9, issue.4, pp.365-373, 2001.

S. Baumgaertner and M. F. Quaas, Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty, Ecological Economics, vol.68, issue.7, pp.2008-2020, 2009.

C. Bene, L. Doyen, and D. Gabay, A viability analysis for a bio-economic model, Ecological Economics, vol.36, issue.3, pp.385-396, 2001.

C. Bernard, Matthematical modelling of sustainable development: an application to the case of the rain-forest of Madagascar, pp.152-166, 2009.

C. Bockstaller, L. Guichard, D. Makowski, A. Aveline, P. Girardin et al., Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol.28, pp.139-149, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00886428

M. Bohanec, M. ?nidar?i?, V. Rajkovi?, I. Bratko, and B. Zupan, DEX Methodology: Three Decades of Qualitative Multi-Attribute Modeling, Informatica, vol.37, issue.1, pp.49-54, 2013.

P. Bonnal, M. Bonin, and O. Aznar, Les évolutions inversées de la multifonctionnalité de l'agriculture et des services environnementaux. VertigO -la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement, vol.12, 2012.

,

R. Botreau, M. Bonde, A. Butterworth, P. Perny, M. B. Bracke et al., Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1: a review of existing methods, Animal, vol.1, issue.8, pp.1179-1187, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02659977

D. Bouyssou, Building Criteria: A Prerequisite for MCDA, pp.58-80, 1990.

D. Bouyssou, T. Marchant, M. Pirlot, P. Perny, A. Tsoukias et al., Evaluation and Decision Models a Critical Perspective, Operations Research & Management Science), vol.274, 2000.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01573453

V. C. Briquel, La méthode IDEA (indicateurs de durabilité des exploitations agricoles) : une démarche pédagogique, 2001.

T. Brodaty, B. Crépon, and D. Fougère, Les méthodes microéconométriques d'évaluation et leurs applications aux politiques actives de l'emploi, Économie et Prévision, vol.177, pp.91-118, 2007.

L. M. Canals, J. Chenoweth, A. Chapagain, S. Orr, A. Anton et al., Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: Part I-inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol.14, issue.1, pp.28-42, 2009.

C. Cederberg and M. Stadig, System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol.8, issue.6, pp.350-356, 2003.

S. Chabé-ferret and J. Subervie, Estimation des effets propres des mesures agroenvironnementales du plan de développement rural national 2000-2006 sur les pratiques des agriculteurs: Rapport remis au Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Forêt, vol.222, 2009.

S. Chabé-ferret and J. Subervie, How much green for the buck? Estimating additional and windfall effects of French agro-environmental schemes by DID-matching, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.65, issue.1, pp.12-27, 2013.

L. Chapel, G. Deffuant, S. Martin, and C. Mullon, Defining yield policies in a viability approach, Ecological Modelling, vol.212, issue.1-2, pp.10-15, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00454451

M. S. Corson and M. Doreau, Évaluation de l'utilisation de l'eau en élevage, INRA Productions Animales, vol.26, issue.3, pp.239-248, 2013.

R. Costanza, R. Darge, R. Degroot, S. Farber, M. Grasso et al., The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, vol.387, issue.6630, pp.253-260, 1997.

D. Craheix, F. Angevin, J. Bergez, C. Bockstaller, B. Colomb et al., MASC 2.0, un outil d'évaluation multicritère pour estimer la contribution des systèmes de culture au développement durable, Innovations Agronomiques, vol.20, pp.35-48, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02265455

P. M. Cury, C. Mullon, S. M. Garcia, and L. J. Shannon, Viability theory for an ecosystem approach to fisheries, Ices Journal of Marine Science, vol.62, issue.3, pp.577-584, 2005.

M. De-vries and I. J. De-boer, Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments, Livestock Science, vol.128, issue.1-3, pp.1-11, 2010.

P. A. Domenech, P. Saint-pierre, and G. Zaccour, Forest Conservation and CO2 Emissions: A Viable Approach, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol.16, issue.6, pp.519-539, 2011.

L. Doyen, M. De-lara, J. Ferraris, and D. Pelletier, Sustainability of exploited marine ecosystems through protected areas: A viability model and a coral reef case study, Ecological Modelling, vol.208, issue.2-4, pp.353-366, 2007.

K. Eisenack, J. Scheffran, and J. P. Kropp, Viability analysis of management frameworks for fisheries, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol.11, issue.1, pp.69-79, 2006.

M. C. Eisler, M. R. Lee, J. F. Tarlton, G. B. Martin, J. Beddington et al., Steps to sustainable livestock, Nature, vol.507, issue.7490, pp.32-34, 2014.

L. Fahrig, J. Baudry, L. Brotons, F. G. Burel, T. O. Crist et al., Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes, Ecology Letters, vol.14, issue.2, pp.101-112, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00566627

A. Falque, P. Feschet, M. Garrabé, C. Gillet, V. Lagarde et al., Effets socio-économiques des chaines de valeurs. Montpellier: CIRAD (Collection Thema de la revue FruiTrop), vol.172, p.p, 2013.

M. Gerber, L. Astigarraga, C. Bockstaller, J. L. Fiorelli, N. Hostiou et al., Le modèle Dexi-SH* pour une évaluation multicritère de la durabilité agroécologique des systèmes d'élevage bovins laitiers herbagers, Innovations Agronomiques, vol.4, pp.249-252, 2009.

R. Geyer, D. M. Stoms, J. P. Lindner, F. W. Davis, and B. Wittstock, Coupling GIS and LCA for biodiversity assessments of land use, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol.15, issue.5, pp.454-467, 2010.

P. Girardin, L. Guichard, and C. Bockstaller, Indicateurs et tableaux de bord : guide pratique pour l'évaluation environnementale, vol.32, 2015.

M. Grabisch and M. Roubens, Application of the Choquet integral in multicriteria decision making, Fuzzy measures and Integrals -Theory and Applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing Heidelberg, pp.348-374, 2000.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01573484

J. C. Groot, W. A. Rossing, A. Jellema, D. J. Stobbelaar, H. Renting et al., Exploring multiscale trade-offs between nature conservation, agricultural profits and landscape quality -A methodology to support discussions on land-use perspectives, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, vol.120, issue.1, pp.58-69, 2007.

A. Guillaumin, A. C. Dockes, and R. Palazon, La contribution des exploitations d'élevage au développement durable : état des lieux des méthodes d'évaluation et résultats. Rencontres Recherche Ruminants, pp.85-92, 2009.

A. Guillaumin, A. C. Dockès, E. Tchakérian, D. Daridan, S. Gallot et al., La multifonctionnalité de l'agriculture : contrainte ou opportunité pour les agriculteurs ? Courrier de l'environnement de l'INRA, vol.56, pp.45-66, 2008.

J. B. Guinée, Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment. An Operational Guide to the ISO Standards, vol.692, 2002.

J. J. Heckman, R. J. Lalonde, and J. A. Smith, The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs, Handbook of Labor Economics, vol.3, pp.1865-2097, 1999.

, Principles and Framework. Life Cycle Assessment -Environmental management, ISO, 2006.

. Iso, Requirements and guidelines Life Cycle Assessment -Environmental management

J. Lairez and P. Feschet, Agriculture et développement durable, Guide pour l'évaluation multicritère. Dijon / Versailles: Educagri éditions / Editions Quae, 2015.

E. Loiseau, P. Roux, G. Junqua, P. Maurel, and V. Bellon-maurel, Adapting the LCA framework to environmental assessment in land planning, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol.18, issue.8, pp.1533-1548, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02598541

V. Martinet, O. Thebaud, and L. Doyen, Defining viable recovery paths toward sustainable fisheries, Ecological Economics, vol.64, issue.2, pp.411-422, 2007.

, Rapport de synthèse de l'Évaluation des Écosystèmes pour le Millénaire 59 p, 2005.

T. T. Nguyen, M. S. Corson, M. Doreau, M. Eugene, and H. M. Van-der-werf, Consequential LCA of switching from maize silage-based to grass-based dairy systems, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol.18, issue.8, pp.1470-1484, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01209142

T. T. Nguyen, H. M. Van-der-werf, M. Eugene, P. Veysset, J. Devun et al., Effects of type of ration and allocation methods on the environmental impacts of beef-production systems, Livestock Science, vol.145, issue.1-3, pp.239-251, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01209098

L. Nitschelm, J. Aubin, M. S. Corson, V. Viaud, and C. Walter, Spatial differentiation in Life Cycle Assessment LCA applied to an agricultural territory: current practices and method development, Environmental Management -Life Cycle Assessment -Principles and Framework, vol.112, pp.2472-2484, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01472550

H. T. Odum, Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making, vol.384, 1995.

H. T. Odum and E. P. Odum, The energetic basis for valuation of ecosystem services, Ecosystems, vol.3, issue.1, pp.21-23, 2000.

C. Paoli, P. Vassallo, and M. Fabiano, An emergy approach for the assessment of sustainability of small marinas, Ecological Engineering, vol.33, issue.2, pp.167-178, 2008.

S. Payraudeau and H. M. Van-der-werf, Environmental impact assessment for a farming region: A review of methods, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, vol.107, issue.1, pp.1-19, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01460798

N. Pelletier and P. Tyedmers, An Ecological Economic Critique of the Use of Market Information in Life Cycle Assessment Research, Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol.15, issue.3, pp.342-354, 2011.

P. Perny, Multicriteria filtering methods based on concordance and non-discordance principles, Annals of Operations Research, vol.80, pp.137-165, 1998.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01195771

S. Pfister, A. Koehler, and S. Hellweg, Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA, Environmental Science & Technology, vol.43, issue.11, pp.4098-4104, 2009.

S. Polasky, E. Nelson, E. Lonsdorf, P. Fackler, and A. Starfield, Conserving species in a working landscape: Land use with biological and economic objectives, Ecological Applications, vol.15, issue.4, pp.1387-1401, 2005.

B. Roy, Decision Science or Decision-Aid Science, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.66, issue.2, pp.184-203, 1993.

B. Rugani, E. Benetto, D. Arbault, and L. Tiruta-barna, Emergy-based mid-point valuation of ecosystem goods and services for life cycle impact assessment. Revue De Metallurgie-Cahiers D Informations Techniques, vol.110, pp.249-264, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01268442

J. Ryschawy, M. Tichit, S. Bertrand, G. Allaire, S. Plantureux et al., Comment évaluer les services rendus par l'élevage ? Une approche méthodologique sur le cas de la France, INRA Productions Animales, vol.28, issue.1, pp.23-37, 2015.

R. Sabatier, L. Doyen, and M. Tichit, Modelling trade-offs between livestock grazing and wader conservation in a grassland agroecosystem, Ecological Modelling, vol.221, issue.9, pp.1292-1300, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01197834

,

R. Sabatier, L. G. Oates, and R. D. Jackson, Management flexibility of a grassland agroecosystem: A modeling approach based on viability theory, Agricultural Systems, vol.139, pp.76-81, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01198290

W. Sadok, F. Angevin, J. E. Bergez, C. Bockstaller, B. Colomb et al., Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: Guidelines for identifying relevant multi-criteria decision aid methods. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol.28, pp.163-174, 2008.

,

J. H. Schmidt, Development of LCIA characterisation factors for land use impacts on biodiversity, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.16, issue.18, pp.1929-1942, 2008.

M. Tichit, L. Doyen, J. Y. Lemel, O. Renault, and D. Durant, A co-viability model of grazing and bird community management in farmland, Ecological Modelling, vol.206, issue.3-4, pp.277-293, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01197774

M. Tichit, B. Hubert, L. Doyen, and D. Genin, A viability model to assess the sustainability of mixed herds under climatic uncertainty, Animal Research, vol.53, issue.5, pp.405-417, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00889947

S. Ulgiati and M. T. Brown, Quantifying the environmental support for dilution and abatement of process emissions -The case of electricity production, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.10, issue.4, pp.44-44, 2002.

, Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products, UNEP, p.103, 2009.

, ESCo Inra -Rôles, impacts et services issus des élevages en, Europe, vol.266

H. G. Van-der-werf and J. Petit, Evaluation of environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: A comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, vol.93, issue.1-3, pp.131-145, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02681001

I. Vazquez-rowe, S. Rege, A. Marvuglia, J. Thenie, A. Haurie et al., Application of three independent consequential LCA approaches to the agricultural sector in Luxembourg, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol.18, issue.8, pp.1593-1604, 2013.

I. Veissier, K. K. Jensen, R. Botreau, and P. Sandoe, Highlighting ethical decisions underlying the scoring of animal welfare in the Welfare Quality (R) scheme, Animal Welfare, vol.20, issue.1, pp.89-101, 2011.

M. Vigne, J. L. Peyraud, P. Lecomte, M. S. Corson, and A. Wilfart, Emergy evaluation of contrasting dairy systems at multiple levels, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.129, pp.44-53, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01209117

,

L. E. Vilain, La méthode IDEA -Indicateurs de durabilité des exploitations agricoles -Guide d'utilisation, 2008.

M. D. Watanabe and E. Ortega, Dynamic emergy accounting of water and carbon ecosystem services: A model to simulate the impacts of land-use change, Ecological Modelling, vol.271, pp.113-131, 2014.

,

A. Wilfart, M. S. Corson, and J. Aubin, Emergy accounting: principles and application for environmental assessment of agricultural and animal production systems, INRA Productions Animales, vol.25, issue.1, pp.57-65, 2012.

A. Wilfart, J. Prudhomme, J. P. Blancheton, and J. Aubin, LCA and emergy accounting of aquaculture systems: Towards ecological intensification, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.121, pp.96-109, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01209129

,

C. Winckler, B. Algers, K. Van-reenen, H. Leruste, I. Veissier et al., Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle (fattening cattle, dairy cows, veal calves), 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02821857

R. R. Yager, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol.18, pp.183-190, 1988.

F. Zahm, P. Viaux, L. Vilain, P. Girardin, and C. Mouchet, Assessing farm sustainability with the IDEA methodfrom the concept of cgriculture custainability to case ctudies on carms, Sustainable Development, vol.16, pp.271-281, 2008.

W. Zhang, T. H. Ricketts, C. Kremen, K. Carney, and S. M. Swinton, Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture, Ecological Economics, vol.64, issue.2, pp.253-260, 2007.

Y. Zhang, S. Singh, and B. R. Bakshi, Accounting for Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part I: A Critical Review, Environmental Science & Technology, vol.44, issue.7, pp.2232-2242, 2010.