, no blame no shame" strategies -the criteria that encompass most consensual indicators are: Health, Safety and Hygiene (3) and Prohibited Labour Employment Practices (5) -than towards serious social sustainability dimensions -such as avoiding social risks (insurance) or increasing capabilities for producers (association, collective bargaining, training)
Life cycle attribute assessment -case study of Quebec tomatoes, J. of Ind. Ecology, vol.13, issue.4, pp.565-578, 2009. ,
A framework for social life cycle impact assessment, Int. Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol.11, issue.2, pp.88-97, 2006. ,
Generic Fairtrade Standards for small producers' organizations, Référentiel technique définissant les exigences portant sur les produits issus du commerce équitable, Version du 15.02.2010, L'Isle Jourdian : Ecocert, 56 p. ETI, vol.13, pp.96-103, 2007. ,
Integration of working environment into life cycle assessment framework, Int. J. of LCA, vol.14, pp.290-301, 2009. ,
Socioeconomic indicators as a complement to life cycle assessment -an application to salmon production systems, Int. J. of LCA, vol.14, pp.8-18, 2009. ,
Social Impacts in Product Life Cycles, Int. J. of LCA, Special Issue, vol.1, pp.97-104, 2006. ,
Utz Certified Good Inside Code of Conduct for Coffee, Version 1.1, United Nations Environment Programme. Utz Certified, vol.28, 2009. ,
The integration of economic and social aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Int. J. of LCA, Special issue, vol.1, pp.89-96, 2006. ,