K. Adamcz, A. Górecka-bruzda, J. Nowicki, M. Gumu?ka, E. Molik et al., Perception of environment in farm animals -A review, 2015.

A. , Anim. Sci, vol.15, pp.565-589

A. Albiach-serrano, J. Bräuer, T. Cacchione, N. Zickert, and F. Amici, The effect of domestication and ontogeny in swine cognition (Sus scrofa scrofa and S. s. domestica), Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.141, pp.25-35, 2012.

I. L. Andersen, S. Berg, K. E. Boe, and S. Edwards, Positive handling in late pregnancy and the consequences for maternal behaviour and production in sows, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.99, pp.64-76, 2006.

I. L. Andersen, I. A. Haukvik, and K. E. Boe, Drying and warming immediately after birth may reduce piglet mortality in loose-housed sows, Animal, vol.3, pp.592-597, 2009.

G. Bataille, Y. Rugraff, M. C. Meunier-salaün, A. Bregeon, and A. Prunier, Conséquences comportementales, zootechniques et physiologiques de l' épointage des dents chez le porcelet, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.34, pp.203-209, 2002.

M. Benjamin and S. Yik, Precision livestock farming in swine welfare: a review for swine practitioners, Animals, vol.9, p.133, 2019.

S. Bensoussan, M. Cornil, M. C. Meunier-salaün, and C. Tallet, Do piglets (Sus scrofa domestica) use human visual and/or vocal signals to find hidden feeding reward?, Proc. Conf, p.409, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02744121

S. Bensoussan, R. Tigeot, A. Lemasson, M. C. Meunier-salaün, and C. Tallet, Domestic piglets (Sus scrofa domestica) are attentive to human voice and able to discriminate some prosodic features, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.210, pp.38-45, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01897331

S. Bensoussan, R. Tigeot, M. C. Meunier-salaün, and C. Tallet, Broadcasting human voice to piglets, 2020.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02479995

, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, 104965.

A. Boissy, G. Manteuffel, M. B. Jensen, R. O. Moe, B. Spruijt et al., Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare, Physiol. Behav, vol.92, pp.375-397, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02756222

X. Boivin, B. J. Lensink, C. Tallet, and I. Veissier, Stockmanship and farm animal welfare, Anim. Welfare, vol.12, pp.479-492, 2003.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02669403

X. Boivin, S. Bensoussan, N. Bignon, L. Brives, H. Brule et al., Hommes et animaux d'élevage au travail : vers une approche pluridisciplinaire des pratiques relationnelles, INRA Prod. Anim, vol.25, pp.159-168, 2012.

R. Botreau, I. Veissier, A. Butterworth, M. B. Bracke, and L. J. Keeling, Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare, Anim. Welfare, vol.16, pp.225-228, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02665850

S. Brajon, J. P. Laforest, O. Schmitt, and N. Devillers, The way humans behave modulates the emotional state of piglets, Plos One, vol.10, p.133408, 2015.

S. Brajon, J. P. Laforest, R. Bergeron, C. Tallet, and N. Devillers, The perception of humans by piglets: recognition of familiar handlers and generalisation to unfamiliar humans, Anim. Cogn, vol.18, pp.1299-1316, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01211043

S. Brajon, J. P. Laforest, R. Bergeron, C. Tallet, M. J. Hötzel et al., Persistency of the piglet's reactivity to the handler following a previous positive or negative experience, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.162, pp.9-19, 2015.

S. Brajon, J. P. Laforest, O. Schmitt, and N. Devillers, A preliminary study of the effects of individual response to challenge tests and stress induced by humans on learning performance of weaned piglets, 2016.

, Behav. Processes, vol.129, pp.27-36

I. Camerlink, S. P. Turner, W. W. Ursinus, I. Reimert, and J. E. Bolhuis, Aggression and affiliation during social conflict in pigs, PloS one, vol.9, p.113502, 2014.

R. Carreras, L. Arroyo, E. Mainau, D. Valent, A. Bassols et al., Can the way pigs are handled alter behavioural and physiological measures of affective state?, Behav. Processes, vol.142, pp.91-98, 2017.

H. Chaloupkova, G. Illmann, L. J. Pedersen, J. Malmkvist, and M. Simeckova, Sow responsiveness to human contacts and piglet vocalization during 24 h after onset of parturition, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.112, pp.260-269, 2008.

G. J. Coleman, P. H. Hemsworth, M. Hay, and M. Cox, Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.66, pp.11-20, 2000.

C. S. Bensoussan, S. Courboulay, V. Kling-eveillard, F. Meunier-salaün, M. C. Tallet et al., Enquête sur les pratiques de communication des éleveurs de porcs avec leurs animaux, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.48, pp.239-240, 2016.

J. A. Correa, S. Torrey, N. Devillers, J. P. Laforest, H. W. Gonyou et al., Effects of different moving devices at loading on stress response and meat quality in pigs, J. Anim. Sci, vol.88, pp.4086-4093, 2010.

V. Courboulay, C. Tallet, and S. Bensoussan, Development and use of a tool for describing human practices and pig responses during handling, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.45, pp.73-74, 2013.

V. Courboulay, M. C. Meunier-salaün, F. Pol, and M. Stankowiak, BEEP : un outil à disposition des éleveurs pour objectiver le bien-être de leurs animaux, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.51, pp.37-42, 2019.

V. Courboulay, F. Kling-eveillard, F. Champigneulle, . Fresnay-eloïse, and F. Pol, Ce que nous dit la réactivité des truies à l'homme sur leurs performances et leurs conditions de vie, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.52, pp.361-366, 2020.

D. Boyer-des-roches, A. Durier, V. Richard-yris, M. A. Blois-heulin, C. Ezzaouia et al., Differential outcomes of unilateral interferences at birth, Biol. Letters, vol.7, pp.177-180, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01019961

N. De-briyne, C. Berg, T. Blaha, and D. Temple, Pig castration: will the EU manage to ban pig castration by, Porcine Health Management, vol.2, p.29, 2016.

A. Dimberton, La sécurité de l'éleveur et le bien être des bovins pendant la contention : étude de méthodes adaptées au comportement animal, p.109, 1999.

P. R. English, S. A. Grant, O. Mcpherson, and S. A. Edwards, Evaluation of the effects of the positive 'befriending' of sows and gilts ('pleasant' treatment) prior to parturition and in early lactation on sow behaviour, the process of parturition and piglet survival, Occasional Publication -Br. Soc. Anim. Sci, pp.132-136, 1999.

D. Q. Estep and S. Hetts, Interactions, relationships, and bonds: the conceptual basis for scientist-animal relations, The inevitable bond: examining scientist-animal interactions, pp.6-26, 1992.

C. Fiorelli, S. Mouret, and J. Porcher, Les rationalités du travail avec les animaux d' élevage : produire, vivre ensemble et se construire, Numéro special, 2012.

, INRA Prod. Anim, vol.25, pp.181-192

B. Fredriksen, M. Font-i-furnols, K. Lundström, W. Migdal, A. Prunier et al., Practice on castration of piglets in Europe, Animal, vol.3, pp.1480-1487, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02755637

N. A. Geverink, D. Jong, I. C. Lambooij, E. Blokhuis, H. J. Wiegant et al., Influence of housing conditions on responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for meat quality, Canadian J. Anim. Sci, vol.79, pp.285-291, 1999.

T. Grandin, Pig behavior studies applied to slaughter-plant design, Appl. Anim. Ethol, vol.9, pp.141-151, 1982.

M. Hay, A. Vulin, S. Génin, P. Sales, and A. Prunier, Assessment of pain induced by castration in piglets: behavioral and physiological responses over the subsequent 5 days, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.82, pp.201-218, 2003.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02680457

R. S. Heffner and H. E. Heffner, Hearing in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) and goats (Capra hircus), Hearing Res, vol.48, pp.231-240, 1990.

P. Hemsworth, Behavioural principles of pig handling, Livestock handling and transport, pp.255-274, 2000.

P. H. Hemsworth, Ethical Stockmanship, Aust. Vet. J, vol.85, pp.194-200, 2007.

P. H. Hemsworth, H. W. Gonyou, and P. J. Dziuk, Human communication with pigs: the behavioural response of pigs to specific human signals, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.15, pp.45-54, 1986.

P. H. Hemsworth, G. J. Coleman, and J. L. Barnett, , 1994.

, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.39, pp.349-362

P. H. Hemsworth, J. Verge, and G. J. Coleman, Conditioned approach-avoidance responses to humans: the ability of pigs to associate feeding and aversive social experiences in the presence of humans with humans, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.50, pp.71-82, 1996.

P. H. Hemsworth, J. L. Barnett, and R. G. Campbell, A study of the relative aversiveness of a new daily injection procedure for pigs, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.49, pp.389-401, 1996.

S. Henry, D. Hemery, M. A. Richard, and M. Hausberger, Human-mare relationships and behaviour of foals toward humans, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.93, pp.341-362, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01359874

I. Horrell and J. Hodgson, The bases of sow-piglet identification. 2. Cues used by piglets to identify their dam and home pen, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.33, pp.329-343, 1992.

M. J. Hötzel, G. P. De-souza, L. C. Machado-filho, R. Irgang, and R. Probst, Stress and recognition of humans in weanling piglets, Biotemas, vol.20, pp.91-98, 2007.

J. Hulsen and K. Scheepens, Signes de porcs -observer, réfléchir, agir. Roodbont Éditions, p.96, 2007.

G. Illmann, L. Schrader, M. ?pinka, and P. ?ustr, Acoustical mother-offspring recognition in pigs (Sus scrofa domestica), Behav, vol.139, pp.487-505, 2002.

E. Kanitz, M. Tuchscherer, B. Puppe, A. Tuchscherer, and B. Stabenow, Consequences of repeated early isolation in domestic piglets (Sus scrofa) on their behavioural, neuroendocrine, and immunological responses, Brain, Behav., Immun, vol.18, pp.35-45, 2004.

R. D. Kirkden, D. M. Broom, and I. L. Andersen, Piglet mortality: management solutions, J. Anim. Sci, vol.91, pp.3361-3389, 2013.

F. Kling-eveillard, N. Hostiou, E. Ganis, A. Philibert, V. Courboulay et al., L'élevage de précision, quels changements dans la relation homme-animal et la représentation de leur métier par les éleveurs ?, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.50, pp.263-268, 2018.

Y. Koba and H. Tanida, How do miniature pigs discriminate between people? The effect of exchanging cues between a non-handler and their familiar handler on discrimination, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.61, pp.239-252, 1999.

Y. Koba and H. Tanida, How do miniature pigs discriminate between people? Discrimination between people wearing coveralls of the same colour, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.73, pp.45-58, 2001.

T. Lemoine, B. Houdoin, C. Calvar, A. Dubois, F. Maupertuis et al., Quelles sont les pratiques d' élevage qui favorisent la survie des porcelets en maternité ?, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.50, pp.299-304, 2018.

C. A. Lomas, D. Piggins, and C. J. Phillips, Visual awareness, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.57, pp.247-257, 1998.

J. Maletinska, M. Spinka, J. Vichova, and I. Stehulova, Individual recognition of piglets by sows in the early post-partum period, Behav, vol.139, pp.975-991, 2002.

J. N. Marchant-forde, D. C. Lay, . Jr, K. A. Mcmunn, H. W. Cheng et al., Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: The effects of alternative techniques delivered separately, J. Anim. Sci, vol.87, pp.1479-1492, 2009.

M. A. Mcleman, M. T. Mendl, R. B. Jones, and C. M. Wathes, Social discrimination of familiar conspecifics by juvenile pigs, Sus scrofa: development of a non-invasive method to study the transmission of unimodal and bimodal cues between live stimuli, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.115, pp.123-137, 2008.

G. B. Meese and R. Ewbak, Establishment and nature of the dominance hierarchy in the domesticated pig, 1973.

, Anim. Behav, vol.21, pp.326-334

S. Mignon-grasteau, A. Boissy, J. Bouix, J. M. Faure, A. D. Fisher et al., Genetics of adaptation and domestication in livestock, Livest. Prod. Sci, vol.93, pp.3-14, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02681392

C. Nawroth, M. Ebersbach, V. Borell, and E. , Juvenile domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) use human-given cues in an object choice task, Anim. Cogn, vol.17, pp.701-713, 2014.

C. Nawroth, J. Langbein, M. Coulon, V. Gabor, S. Oesterwind et al., Farm animal cognition-linking behavior, welfare and ethics, Front. Vet. Sci, vol.6, 2019.

B. L. Nielsen, Making sense of it all: the importance of taking into account the sensory abilities of animals in their housing and management, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.205, pp.175-180, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02622030

G. P. Pearce, A. M. Paterson, and A. N. Pearce, The influence of pleasant and unpleasant handling and the provision of toys on the growth and behaviour of male pigs, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.23, pp.27-37, 1989.

D. Piggins and C. J. Phillips, Awareness in domesticated animals--concepts and definitions, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.57, pp.181-200, 1998.

J. Porcher, The relationship between workers and animals in the pork industry: a shared suffering, J. Agr. Environ. Ethic, vol.24, pp.3-17, 2011.

A. Prunier and C. Tallet, Endocrine and behavioural responses of sows to human interactions and consequences on reproductive performance, pp.279-295, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01210734

A. Prunier, G. Bataille, M. C. Meunier-salaün, A. Bregeon, and Y. Rugraff, Conséquences comportementales, zootechniques et physiologiques de la caudectomie réalisée avec ou sans insensibilisation locale chez le porcelet, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.33, pp.313-318, 2001.

A. Prunier, M. Gallois, A. Klouytten, L. Cozler, and Y. , Effets de l' épointage des dents sur les performances, les lésions cutanées et le comportement des truies et des porcelets, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.36, pp.379-388, 2004.

A. Prunier, N. Devillers, M. S. Herskin, D. A. Sandercock, A. R. Sinclair et al., Husbandry interventions in suckling piglets, painful consequences and mitigation, sous presse

Y. Ramonet, M. E. Caille, A. Dubois, F. Paboeuf, C. Calvar et al., Les truies gestantes en groupes. Pratiques dans les élevages de l'Ouest de la France, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.43, pp.161-170, 2011.

M. Spinka, The ethology of domestic animals 2 nd editionan introductory text, pp.177-191, 2009.

C. Tallet, S. Claude, C. Guerin, M. C. Meunier-salaun, and A. Prunier, Conséquences de deux alternatives à la castration des porcs sur leur comportement en isolement et en présence d'un homme non familier, Journ. Rech. Porcine, vol.45, pp.71-72, 2013.

H. Tanida and Y. Nagano, The ability of miniature pigs to discriminate between a stranger and their familiar handler, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.56, pp.149-159, 1998.

H. Tanida, K. I. Senda, S. Suzuki, T. Tanaka, and T. Yoshimoto, Color discrimination in weanling pigs, Anim. Sci. Tech, vol.62, pp.1029-1034, 1991.

H. Tanida, A. Miura, T. Tanaka, and T. Yoshimoto, The role of handling in communication between humans and weanling pigs, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.40, pp.219-228, 1994.

D. Temple, X. Manteca, A. Velarde, and A. Dalmau, Assessment of animal welfare through behavioural parameters in Iberian pigs in intensive and extensive conditions, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.131, pp.29-39, 2011.

E. M. Terlouw, J. Porcher, and X. Fernandez, Repeated handling of pigs during rearing. ii. effect of reactivity to humans on aggression during mixing and on meat quality, J. Anim. Sci, vol.83, pp.1664-1672, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00487123

T. S. Devillers, N. Lessard, M. Farmer, C. Widowski, and T. , Effect of age on the behavioral and physiological responses of piglets to tail docking and ear notching, J. Anim. Sci, vol.87, pp.1778-1786, 2009.

S. P. Turner and C. M. Dwyer, Welfare assessment in extensive animal production systems: challenges and opportunities, Anim. Welfare, vol.16, pp.189-192, 2007.

A. Villain, A. Hazard, C. Guérin, A. Boissy, and C. Tallet, Vocal expression of emotions in pigs during anticipation of positive social contexts: Impact of human animal relationship, Proc. Int. Bioacoustic Congr, p.112, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02375156

S. Waiblinger, X. Boivin, V. Pedersen, M. Tosi, A. M. Janczak et al., Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.101, pp.185-242, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02666151

D. F. Waynert, J. M. Stookey, K. S. Schwartzkopf-genswein, J. M. Watts, and C. S. Waltz, The response of beef cattle to noise during handling, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.62, pp.27-42, 1999.

R. White, J. A. Deshazer, C. J. Tressler, G. M. Borcher, S. Davey et al., Vocalization and physiological response of pigs during castration with or without a local anesthetic, J. Anim. Sci, vol.73, pp.381-386, 1995.

J. J. Zonderland, L. Cornelissen, M. Wolthuis-fillerup, and H. A. Spoolder, Visual acuity of pigs at different light intensities, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, vol.111, pp.28-37, 2008.

, Cette synthèse propose un bilan des travaux sur la relation humain-animal en élevage porcin. Les pratiques et les modes d'élevage ont un impact sur la relation à l'humain. Certaines pratiques sont source de douleur et de peur pour les porcelets, et provoquent des réactions ultérieures de peur vis-à-vis des humains, même inconnus. Inversement, des pratiques ayant pour but de développer une relation de proximité diminuent la peur des humains et favorisent une relation de confiance. En effet, les interactions humaines modifient le comportement des porcs. La présence humaine suffit à habituer un porcelet aux humains, même quelques minutes par jour. Parler aux animaux est primordial, y compris in utero. Les porcelets apprécient les contacts tactiles doux, caresses ou grattages. L'humain, ainsi associé à des interactions positives, prend une valeur positive, ce qui permet d'instaurer un climat de confiance et peut susciter des émotions positives favorables au bien-être animal. Créer une bonne relation en élevage est donc essentiel. Ceci sera bénéfique non seulement au bien-être des porcs, mais aussi à la sécurité et la satisfaction au travail des éleveurs, Résumé La relation entre les porcs et les humains est au centre de l'élevage et est un des piliers du bien-être animal. L'humain, par son comportement et ses choix de pratiques, de conditions de logement et de gestion du troupeau va influencer l'état mental de ses animaux