Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Bureaucrats or Ideologues? EU Merger Control as Market-centred Integration*

Abstract : Since 1989, no major European merger has been able to go through without EU approval. The introduction of a centralized merger control procedure was another increase in the powers of the Commission's Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP). While some see it playing a neo-mercantilist role in a positive European integration, others underline its neoliberal ideological roots. Through our analysis of all merger decisions made between 1990 and 2016 (6,161 cases), we instead find evidence for market-centred negative integration: DG COMP is particularly harsh towards coordinated market economies and targets sectors that have high levels of state intervention, thus thwarting the rise of 'European champions'. Our interviews with merger experts and the decision citation data further suggest that this market-centred logic of enforcement is not necessarily driven by ideology, but by the silent logic of bureaucratic autonomy. We thus contribute to the debate on the EU as a supranational force of economic liberalization.
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Sebastian Billows Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, July 23, 2021 - 12:21:28 PM
Last modification on : Friday, August 5, 2022 - 2:58:08 PM


Billows_Kohl_Tarissan_EU Merge...
Publication funded by an institution


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License



Sebastian Billows, Sebastian Kohl, Fabien Tarissan. Bureaucrats or Ideologues? EU Merger Control as Market-centred Integration*. Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley, 2021, 59 (4), pp.762-781. ⟨10.1111/jcms.13130⟩. ⟨hal-03101468v2⟩



Record views


Files downloads