Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 1: Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Year : 2020

Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 1: Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders

(1) , (1) , (1, 2)
1
2

Domains

Life Sciences [q-bio] Ecology, environment Health
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
S0895435619302434.pdf (317.99 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)

Accord Elsevier CCSD  : Connect in order to contact the contributor

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03346273

Submitted on : Tuesday, August 30, 2022-8:48:28 AM

Last modification on : Wednesday, September 28, 2022-5:56:55 AM

Download

Dates and versions

hal-03346273 , version 1 (30-08-2022)

Licence

Attribution - NonCommercial - CC BY 4.0

Identifiers

Elsevier-hosted Accepted Manuscript

Cite

Astrid Chevance, Viet-Thi Tran, Philippe Ravaud. Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 1: Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020, 125, pp.206-212.e1. ⟨10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.004⟩. ⟨hal-03346273⟩

Export

BibTeX TEI Dublin Core DC Terms EndNote Datacite

Collections

INSERM CNAM UNIV-HESAM INRAE UNIV-PARIS UP-SANTE CRESS
18 View
12 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More