Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 1: Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Year : 2020

Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 1: Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders

(1) , (1) , (1, 2)
1
2
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
S0895435619302434.pdf (317.99 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)

Dates and versions

hal-03346273 , version 1 (30-08-2022)

Licence

Attribution - NonCommercial - CC BY 4.0

Identifiers

Cite

Astrid Chevance, Viet-Thi Tran, Philippe Ravaud. Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 1: Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020, 125, pp.206-212.e1. ⟨10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.004⟩. ⟨hal-03346273⟩
18 View
12 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More