The Ranking of Economics Journals by the Economic Society of Australia, Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy, vol.1, issue.6, pp.176-180, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2009.00020.x
Tiers for the Australian Ranking of Journals, 2008. ,
A Review of Current Australian and International Practice in Measuring the Quality and Impact of Publicly Funded Research in the Humanities, REPP discussion paper 05, p.37, 2005. ,
ERA replaces RQF, Australasian Journal of Information systems, vol.25, issue.2, pp.5-6, 2008. ,
Summary guidelines, 2007. ,
Revisted ERIH summary guidelines, 2007. ,
A reply to the Criticismresearch-areas/humanities/erih-european-reference-index-for-thehumanities/joint-response-to-criticism .html), 2008. ,
Argument accompanying the History and Philosophy of science journals list (http://www.aeresevaluation.fr/content/download, 2009. ,
Argument accompanying the Psychology-Ethology-Ergonomics journals list (http://www.aeresevaluation .fr/content/download, 2009. ,
Argument accompanying the Sociology-Demography journals list (http://www.aeresevaluation .fr/content/download, 2009. ,
Editorial: Classer, évaluer, pp.1-4, 2008. ,
University research funding and publication performance???An international comparison, Research Policy, vol.39, issue.6, pp.822-834, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003
Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science, 1988. ,
Une technologie invisible ? L'impact des instruments de gestion sur l'évolution des systèmes humains. Paris, http://crg.polytechnique.fr/fichiers A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures, PloS one, vol.4, issue.6, p.6022, 1983. ,
Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences, 1999. ,
Measuring research quality: peer review 1, citation indices 0, Omega, vol.28, issue.2, pp.237-239, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00048-1
What happens when funding is linked to publication counts? In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, pp.389-405, 2004. ,
Using a balanced approach to bibliometrics: quantitative performance measures in the Australian Research Quality Framework, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, vol.8, pp.83-92, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.3354/esep00077
Metrics or Peer Review? Evaluating the 2001 UK Research Assessment Exercise in Political Science, Political Studies Review, vol.56, issue.6, pp.3-17, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2008.00167.x
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today--Part 1, Science Communication, vol.19, issue.3, pp.181-211, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1075547098019003002
Australian standard research classification. A set of classifications for R1D projects, Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1993. ,
Evaluating universities using simple scientometric research-output metrics: total citation counts per university for a retrospective seven-year rolling sample, Science and Public Policy, vol.34, issue.8, pp.34-555, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.3152/030234207X254413
The Hierarchy of the Sciences?, American Journal of Sociology, vol.89, issue.1, pp.111-139, 1983. ,
DOI : 10.1086/227835
The Governance of Social Science and Everyday Epistemology, Public Administration, vol.7, issue.3, pp.597-615, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00049-3
Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds, American Journal of Sociology, vol.113, issue.1, pp.1-40, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1086/517897
What is a Significant Journal? Current Contents, pp.106-107, 1970. ,
From experimentation to coordination in the evaluation of Spanish scientific journals in the humanities and social sciences, Research Evaluation, vol.16, issue.2, pp.137-148, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.3152/095820207X220409
Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: a review and a study towards a model of evaluation, Research Evaluation, vol.18, issue.3, pp.201-213, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.3152/095820209X471986
Why are the Most Influential Books in Australian Sociology not Necessarily the Most Highly Cited Ones?, Journal of Sociology, vol.73, issue.3, pp.261-282, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1440783304046370
Advantages and dangers of ???remote??? peer evaluation, Research Evaluation, vol.14, issue.3, pp.141-54, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.3152/147154405781776085
Indicators for national science and technology policy. T heir Development, Use, and Possible Misuse, Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, pp.75-94, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_4
A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments, Political Studies Review, vol.16, issue.3, pp.293-313, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2004.00011.x
Journal Rankings and Academic Research: Two Discourses About the Quality of Faculty Work, Management Communication Quarterly, vol.23, issue.1, pp.107-126, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0893318909335419
European economics: An analysis based on publications in the core journals, European Economic Review, vol.43, issue.4-6, pp.1150-1168, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(99)00019-7
A Ranking of the Top Canadian Economics Departments by Research Productivity of Graduates, The Canadian Journal of Economics, vol.18, issue.4, pp.904-907, 1985. ,
DOI : 10.2307/135100
How professors think : inside the curious world of academic judgment, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.4159/9780674054158
The Ranking Game, Class, and Scholarship in American Mainstream Economics, Journal of Economics, vol.3, pp.1-41, 2006. ,
A Case for Ranking Heterodox Journals and Departments. On the Horizon, pp.241-251, 2008. ,
How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.59, issue.1, pp.1327-1336, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1002/asi.21024
Aardvark et al.: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies, Journal of Information Science, vol.33, issue.6, pp.702-717, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0165551507077419
Impact factors and peer judgment: The case of regional science journals, Scientometrics, vol.69, issue.3, pp.651-667, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-006-0175-0
The SCI Journal Citation Reports: A potential tool for studying journals?, Scientometrics, vol.33, issue.No. 22, pp.93-117, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF02018235
Assessing basic research, Research Policy, vol.12, issue.2, pp.61-90, 1983. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7
The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review, Science and Public Policy, vol.34, issue.8, pp.575-583, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.3152/030234207X255179
Towards Research Performance in the Humanities, Library Trends, vol.50, issue.3, pp.498-520, 2002. ,
Impact factors can mislead, Nature, vol.381, issue.6579, p.381186, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1038/381186a0
Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index, Journal of Informetrics, vol.4, issue.1, pp.107-117, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.001
Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review, Scientometrics, vol.66, issue.1, pp.81-100, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2
The Relationship Between International Editorial Board Composition and Citation Measures in Political Science, Business, and Genetics Journals, Scientometrics, vol.54, issue.2, pp.257-268, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1016065929026
Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences??? literature, Journal of Informetrics, vol.1, issue.2, pp.161-169, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001
Is there life beyond the ISI Journal lists? The international impact of Spanish, Italian, French and German economics journals, Applied Economics, vol.12, issue.6, pp.42-689, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.09.011
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00582057
Revues qui comptent, revues qu'on compte : produire des classements en économie et gestion, 1997. ,
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, BMJ, vol.314, issue.7079, pp.314-498, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497
Are Articles in "Top" Management Journals Necessarily of Higher Quality?, Journal of Management Inquiry, vol.16, issue.4, pp.319-331, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1056492607305894
A new approach to the SCI journal citation reports, a system for evaluating scientific journals, Scientometrics, issue.3, pp.47-605, 2000. ,
How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication, Organization Science, vol.16, issue.2, pp.180-200, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1040.0107
International ranking of law journals - can it be done and at what cost?, Legal Studies, vol.29, issue.4, pp.678-691, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2009.00127.x
The paradoxnoia of top journal(s) in marketing, European Journal of Marketing, vol.40, issue.11/12, pp.1153-1168, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1108/03090560610702740
Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review: A comparative case study with policy implications, Scientometrics, vol.2, issue.1, pp.41-335, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF02459050
Metrics: A profusion of measures, Nature, vol.435, issue.7300, pp.864-866, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0006022
Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.38, issue.2, pp.60-1083, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1002/asi.21045
Percentile-Based Journal Impact Factors: A Neglected Collection Development Metric. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship The Citation Culture, 1999. ,
Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system, Minerva, vol.9, issue.1, pp.66-100, 1971. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01553188