Hal will be stopped for maintenance from friday on june 10 at 4pm until monday june 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Impact of stage measurement errors on streamflow uncertainty

Abstract : Stage measurement errors are generally overlooked when streamflow time series are derived from uncertain rating curves. We introduce an original method for propagating stage uncertainties due to two types of stage measurement errors: (i) errors of the stage read during the gauging and (ii) systematic and nonsystematic (independent) errors of the recorded stage time series. The error models are generic and can be used for any probabilistic rating curve estimation method that provides an ensemble of rating curves. The new method is applied to a range of six contrasting hydrometric stations in France. Uncertainty budgets quantifying the contribution of various error sources to the total streamflow uncertainty are computed and compared for streamflow time series averaged at time intervals from hour to year. A sensitivity analysis is conducted on the stage time series error model to identify the most sensitive parameters. The results are site specific, which illustrates the key role played by the properties of both the hydrometric site and the gauged catchment. Across the range of sites, stage errors of the gaugings are found to have limited impact on rating curve uncertainty, at least for gaugings performed in fair conditions. Nonsystematic errors in the stage time series have a negligible effect, generally. However, systematic stage errors should not be neglected. Over the six hydrometric stations in this study, the 95% uncertainty component reflecting stage systematic errors (from 60.5 cm to 66.8 cm) alone ranged from 4% to 12% of daily average streamflow, and from 1% to 3% of yearly average streamflow as sensors were assumed to be recalibrated every 30 days. Perspectives for improving and validating the streamflow uncertainty estimation techniques are eventually discussed.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [49 references]  Display  Hide  Download

Contributor : Import Ws Irstea Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, February 18, 2019 - 11:26:06 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, September 7, 2021 - 3:54:17 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Sunday, May 19, 2019 - 1:56:44 PM


Publisher files allowed on an open archive




I. Horner, Benjamin Renard, Jérôme Le Coz, F. Branger, H.K. Mcmillan, et al.. Impact of stage measurement errors on streamflow uncertainty. Water Resources Research, American Geophysical Union, 2018, 54, pp.1952-1976. ⟨10.1002/2017WR022039⟩. ⟨hal-02022803⟩



Record views


Files downloads