Consistency of impact assessment protocols for non-native species - INRAE - Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue NeoBiota Année : 2019

Consistency of impact assessment protocols for non-native species

Pablo Gonzalez-Moreno (1) , Lorenzo Lazzaro (2) , Montserrat Vilà (3, 4) , Cristina Preda (5, 6) , Tim Adriaens (7) , Sven Bacher (5) , Giuseppe Brundu (8) , Gordon H. Copp (9, 10) , Franz Essl (11) , Emili García-Berthou (12) , Stelios Katsanevakis (13) , Toril Loennechen Moen (14) , Frances E. Lucy (15) , Wolfgang Nentwig (16) , Helen E. Roy (17) , Greta Srebaliene (18) , Venche Talgo (19) , Sonia Vanderhoeven (20) , Ana Andjelkovic (21, 22) , Kestutis Arbaciauskas (23) , Marie-Anne Auger-Rozenberg (24) , Mi-Jung Bae (12, 25) , Michel Bariche (26) , Pieter Boets (27) , Mário Boieiro (28, 29) , Paulo Alexandre Borges (28, 29) , João Canning-Clode (30, 31, 32) , Frederico Cardigos (29) , Niki Chartosia (33) , Elizabeth Joanne Cottier-Cook (34) , Fabio Crocetta (35) , Bruno Foggi (2) , Swen Follak (36) , Belinda Gallardo (37) , Oivind Gammelmo , Sylvaine Giakoumi (38) , Claudia Giuliani (39) , Guillaume Fried (40) , Lucija Seric Jelaska (41) , Jonathan M. Jeschke (42, 43, 44) , Miquel Jover (12) , Alejandro Juarez-Escario (45) , Stefanos Kalogirou (46) , Aleksandra Kocic (47) , Eleni Kytinou (13) , Ciaran Laverty (48) , Vanessa Lozano (8) , Alberto Maceda-Veiga (3, 4) , Elizabete Marchante (49) , Hélia Marchante (49, 50) , Angeliki F. Martinou (51) , Sandro Meyer (52) , Dan Michin (18, 53) , Ana Montero-Castano (3, 4) , Maria Cristina Morais (49, 54) , Carmen Morales-Rodriguez (55) , Nadia Muhthassim (16) , Nikica Ogris (56) , Huseyin Onen (57) , Jan Pergl (58) , Riikka Puntila (59) , Wolfgang Rabitsch (60) , Triya Tessa Ramburn (61) , Carla Rego (28, 29) , Fabian Reichenbach (16) , Carmen Romeralo (62, 63) , Wolf-Christian Saul (42, 43, 44) , Gritta Schrader (64) , Rory Sheehan (15) , Predrag Simonović , Marius Skolka (6) , António Onofre Soares (28, 65) , Leif Sundheim (19) , Ali Serhan Tarkan (66) , Rumen Tomov (67) , Elena Tricarico (2) , Konstantinos Tsiamis (68) , Ahmet Uludag , Johan van Valkenburg , Hugo Verreycken (7) , Anna Maria Vettraino , Lluís Vilar (12) , Oystein Wiig , Johanna Witzell (63) , Andrea Zanetta (5) , Marc Kenis
1 CABI - Centre for Agricultural and Biosciences International
2 UniFI - Università degli Studi di Firenze = University of Florence
3 CSIC - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas = Spanish National Research Council
4 EBD - Estación Biológica de Doñana
5 Department of Biology
6 Ovidius University of Constanta
7 INBO - Research Institute for Nature and Forest
8 Department of Agriculture
9 SFT - Salmon & Freshwater Team
10 BU - Bournemouth University [Poole]
11 Division of Conservation, Vegetation and Landscape Ecology
12 UdG - Universitat de Girona
13 Department of Marine Sciences [Aegean]
14 Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre
15 Institute of Technology Sligo
16 Institute of Ecology and Evolution
17 NERC - Natural Environment Research Council
18 KU - Klaipėda University [Lituanie]
19 NIBIO - Norsk institutt for bioøkonomi=Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
20 Service Public de Wallonie
21 Institute for Plant Protection and Environment
22 University of Novi Sad
23 Nature Research Centre
24 URZF - Unité de recherche Zoologie Forestière
25 Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources
26 AUB - American University of Beirut [Beyrouth]
27 Provincial Centre of Environmental Research
28 CE3C - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes
29 Universidade dos Açores
30 MARE UC - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre
31 University of the Azores
32 SERC - Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
33 University of Cyprus = Université de Chypre
34 SAMS - Scottish Association for Marine Science
35 Department of Integrative Marine Ecology
36 Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety
37 Applied and Restoration Ecology Group
38 COMUE UCA - COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019)
39 UNIMI - Università degli Studi di Milano = University of Milan
40 LSV Angers - Laboratoire de santé des végétaux
41 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science
42 IGB - Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries
43 Freie Universität Berlin
44 BBIB - Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research
45 Universitat de Lleida
46 HCMR - Hellenic Centre for Marine Research
47 J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek
48 QUB - Queen's University [Belfast]
49 Centre for Functional ecology
50 Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra
51 Royal Air Forces
52 Department of Environmental Sciences
53 Marine Organism Investigations
54 Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro
55 TUM - Technische Universität Munchen - Technical University Munich - Université Technique de Munich
56 Slovenian Forestry Institute
57 Gaziosmanpaşa University
58 Department of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany
59 CIMA - Marine Research Centre
60 Umweltbundesamt GmbH = Environment Agency Austria
61 SFU.ca - Simon Fraser University
62 Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute
63 SLU - Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences = Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
64 JKI - Julius Kühn-Institut
65 FCT NOVA - Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia = School of Science & Technology
66 Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
67 UF - University of Forestry
68 European Commission's Joint Research Centre
Giuseppe Brundu
Oivind Gammelmo
  • Fonction : Auteur
Guillaume Fried
Vanessa Lozano
Nikica Ogris
Predrag Simonović
  • Fonction : Auteur
Ahmet Uludag
  • Fonction : Auteur
Johan van Valkenburg
  • Fonction : Auteur
Anna Maria Vettraino
  • Fonction : Auteur
Oystein Wiig
  • Fonction : Auteur
Marc Kenis
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Standardized tools are needed to identify and prioritize the most harmful non-native species (NNS). A plethora of assessment protocols have been developed to evaluate the current and potential impacts of non-native species, but consistency among them has received limited attention. To estimate the consistency across impact assessment protocols, 89 specialists in biological invasions used 11 protocols to screen 57 NNS (2614 assessments). We tested if the consistency in the impact scoring across assessors, quantified as the coefficient of variation (CV), was dependent on the characteristics of the protocol, the taxonomic group and the expertise of the assessor. Mean CV across assessors was 40%, with a maximum of 223%. CV was lower for protocols with a low number of score levels, which demanded high levels of expertise, and when the assessors had greater expertise on the assessed species. The similarity among protocols with respect to the final scores was higher when the protocols considered the same impact types. We conclude that all protocols led to considerable inconsistency among assessors. In order to improve consistency, we highlight the importance of selecting assessors with high expertise, providing clear guidelines and adequate training but also deriving final decisions collaboratively by consensus.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2019_GonzalesMoreno_NeoBiota_44_31650_openaccess_1.pdf (1.55 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-02627472 , version 1 (26-05-2020)

Licence

Paternité

Identifiants

Citer

Pablo Gonzalez-Moreno, Lorenzo Lazzaro, Montserrat Vilà, Cristina Preda, Tim Adriaens, et al.. Consistency of impact assessment protocols for non-native species. NeoBiota, 2019, 44, pp.1 - 25. ⟨10.3897/neobiota.44.31650⟩. ⟨hal-02627472⟩
359 Consultations
108 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More