Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

The perils of government enforcement

Abstract : An important part of the debate about self vs state-governance involves a discussion about enforcement mechanisms. While some scholars argue that private enforcement mechanisms work sufficiently well in supporting cooperation, others cite the downfalls of private mechanisms so as to legitimize government enforcement. This paper focuses on the interplay between government and private enforcement mechanisms. Using an experimental approach, we demonstrate two results. First, we show that government enforcement, in the form of a centralized monetary punishment in our experiment, can be useful if aligned with and implemented after a private form of enforcement, namely peer disapproval. However, our second result suggests that the removal of government enforcement leads to a substantial decrease in overall cooperation levels – cooperation levels are higher under private enforcement when subjects had never experienced government enforcement compared to when they had been exposed to government enforcement. Specifically, the removal of government enforcement undermines the power of the remaining private enforcement mechanism to affect the behavior of free-riders.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02637895
Contributor : Migration ProdInra Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, May 28, 2020 - 12:39:55 AM
Last modification on : Friday, August 5, 2022 - 10:35:28 AM

Links full text

Identifiers

Citation

Rustam Romaniuc, Katherine Farrow, Lisette L. Ibanez, Alain Marciano. The perils of government enforcement. Public Choice, Springer Verlag, 2016, 166 (1-2), pp.161-182. ⟨10.1007/s11127-016-0319-6⟩. ⟨hal-02637895⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

117