Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Urban Economics Year : 2010

Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations?

(1, 2) , (3) , (1, 4, 5)
1
2
3
4
5

Abstract

This paper evaluates, in the context of economic geography estimates, the magnitude of the distortions arising from the choice of a specific zoning system, which is also known as the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP). We undertake three standard economic geography exercises (the analysis of spatial concentration, agglomeration economies, and trade determinants), using various French zoning systems differentiated according to the size and shape of their spatial units. While size might matter, especially when the dependent variable of a regression is not aggregated in the same way as the explanatory variables and/or the zoning system involves large spatial units, shape does so much less. In any case, both dimensions are of secondary importance compared to specification issues.

Dates and versions

halshs-00754452 , version 1 (20-11-2012)

Identifiers

Cite

Anthony Briant, Pierre-Philippe Combes, Miren Lafourcade. Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations?. Journal of Urban Economics, 2010, 67 (3), pp.287-302. ⟨10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.014⟩. ⟨halshs-00754452⟩
247 View
0 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More