Feeding n-3 fatty acids (FA) is often cited as a promising strategy to tackle impaired reproduction in dairy cows. However, the scientific literature shows conflicting results that may be explained by the nature of n-3 FA used, the amount supplemented and the timing of supplementation. In addition, designing a proper experimental design to study n-3 FA and reproduction is subjected to other difficulties such as the choice of the control diet or gaining enough statistical power. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to quantify the average effects of supplementing extruded linseed (EL), a feed rich in α-linolenic acid, to dairy cows on reproductive performances under field conditions in French commercial farms. Exposure measurement to EL feeding was particularly challenging as exact cow diets are not traced in farms. Therefore, to investigate the potential dose-effect relationship, we defined a proxy of EL intake per day by using deliveries of EL based feeds from 22 companies in the study period 2008–2015 in France. An artificial insemination (AI) was considered exposed only if the cow was supplemented with EL from the calving until 17 days after AI. Based on recommendations for EL use on the field, 4 exposures classes were created: [1–50] (n = 14,126 AIs), [50–300] (n = 88,261 AIs), [300–600] (n = 66,136 AIs), and [600-1500] (n = 28,287 AIs) g/cow/d. The reference population was composed of cows that did not receive any EL between calving until 17 days after AI within herds that were supplied, but not continuously during the study period (n = 226,795 AIs). Mean daily EL intake in exposed population was 337 g/cow/d (±239.4). Reproductive performance was studied on 423,605 AIs from 1096 herds and 158,125 cows using Cox models for days to first AI and days to conception, and logistic regression models for risk of return-to-service, adjusted for factors likely to influence the reproductive performance and for a herd random effect. Risk of return-to-service between 18 and 78 days after first and second AI did not differ between exposed and reference populations, Nevertheless, the effect on the days to first AI was higher with the lowest EL intake (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.17) than with higher EL intake levels (HR ranging from 1.06 to 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.09). Similarly, for the effect on the time from calving to conception from the lowest EL intake (HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.23) compared to the higher EL intake levels (HR ranging from 1.08 to 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.14). This original large-scale epidemiological study provides new insights into the effects of feeding EL at a commercially sustainable level to dairy cows.