Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Dans les coulisses des articles scientifiques : définir des catégories de fraude et réguler les affaires

Abstract : From a perspective informed by science and technology studies, this article establishes a general diagnosis on the regulation of publication practices and suggest methods of analysis, by reviewing both recent cases of scientific misconduct and others, less recent, that they call to mind. First of all, this paper reviews how the practices deemed to be deviant have been qualifed in the past by distinguishing the categories stemming from data integrity and the conditions of data production from those concerning the relationships between the authors of publications and their content. Then, it analyzes three specific problems and the institutional responses aiming to prevent them, channel them, and attempt to solve them.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02645561
Contributor : Migration Prodinra <>
Submitted on : Friday, May 29, 2020 - 2:02:27 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, August 5, 2020 - 3:08:12 AM

Links full text

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

David Pontille, Didier Torny. Dans les coulisses des articles scientifiques : définir des catégories de fraude et réguler les affaires. Epidemiology and Public Health / Revue d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Elsevier Masson, 2012, 60, pp.247-253. ⟨10.1016/j.respe.2012.06.395⟩. ⟨hal-02645561⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

34