Managing biological invasions: the good, the bad, and the ambivalent - INRAE - Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2012

Managing biological invasions: the good, the bad, and the ambivalent

Résumé

What can economics say about the management of ambivalent biological invasions? Contrasting with the usual assumption according to biological invasions are necessarily a public bad to be prevented or eradicated, the key of this paper is to ask, from an economics standpoint, how positive and ambivalent ecological and economic impacts affect policy making. Reviewing the literature, we highlight the gap between ecological and economics perspectives and discuss the importance of ecological and economic functioning in designing an appropriate policy response to biological invasions. In order to derive methodological insights, we describe a typology of ambivalences and discuss the economics of bio-invasions in the light of this typology presenting a road map for future researches.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Accès au texte intégral_1 (385.73 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-02746879 , version 1 (03-06-2020)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-02746879 , version 1
  • PRODINRA : 215754

Citer

Pierre Courtois, Chloé Mulier, Jean-Michel Salles. Managing biological invasions: the good, the bad, and the ambivalent. 14. Annual BIOECON Conference Resource Economics, Biodiversity Conservation and Development., University of Cambridge [UK] (CAM). Cambridge, GBR.; VU University Amsterdam. NLD., Sep 2012, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 32 p. ⟨hal-02746879⟩
29 Consultations
6 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More