Combining expert knowledge and models in participatory workshops with farmers to design sustainable weed management strategies
Résumé
In order to design cropping systems reconciling crop
production, biodiversity and reduced herbicide use, we
organized participatory workshops with farmers in the
Champagne region (North-Eastern France). Methods
combined cropping-system prototyping by farmers, expert
opinion and models. In a first meeting, farmers determined
their objectives and constraints, and chose a
reference system existing in one of their farms (oilseed
rape/winter wheat/winter wheat/spring barley heavily
infested by autumnal grass weeds). In a second
meeting, two sets of prototypes were designed by two
separate groups, using the Mission Ecophyt’eau® tool
(https://ecophytopic.fr/pour-aller-plus-loin/outil-mission-
ecophyteaur) as support.
The reference and the prototypes were evaluated in
terms of (1) technical feasability from farmers’ and
scientists’ expertise, (2) weed harmfulness for crop
production and weed contribution to biodiversity with
FlorSys which simulates crop and weed growth and reproduction
in cropping systems at a daily time step over
several years (Colbach et al., Weed Res 2014), and (3)
economic, social and environmental sustainability with
the DEXiPM (Pelzer et al, Ecol Indicators 2012) model.
Steps 2 and 3 were carried out after the meeting. At
a third meeting, these results were presented to the
farmers who continued improving the prototypes, using
the DeciFlorSys model which includes decision trees
to guide farmers during cropping-system design and a
fast calculator estimating weed harmfulness and biodiversity
of cropping system prototyes (Colas et al., Eur J
Agron 2020). Both prototypes presented increased crop
diversification, introducing legumes and other broadleaved
crops, crop mixtures and cover crops. Prototype
A was based on reduced tillage and annual crops only.
Prototype B also included multi-annual lucerne and
optimised both tillage and mechanical weeding. Both
prototypes reduced weed harmfulness for crop production
(yield loss, harvest contamination, field infestation)
and herbicide use intensity (approx. -60%) compared
to the reference system. Prototype B also improved
weed-based trophic resources for carabids and pollinators.
The best solution was a suboption of prototype
B replacing most of the herbicides by mechanical
weeding, dividing yield loss by nearly two compared
to the reference and improving biodiversity by 5-10%.
The workshop participants appreciated the knowledge
on agroecosystem functioning and the complementarity
of models: DeciFlorSys allowed a direct evaluation
during workshops, FlorSys produced a detailed diagnosis
of the technical and meteorological causes of the
cropping systems’ performance and DEXiPM assessed
working times and economic viability of the prototypes.
Following the workshops, some participants invested
in new implements for mechanical weeding and introduced
more spring crops into their rotations.