Abstract Operator choices, both in acquiring the video and data and in processing them, can be a prominent source of error in image‐based velocimetry methods applied to river discharge measurements. The Large Scale Particle Image Velocimetry (LSPIV) is known to be sensitive to the parameters and computation choices set by the user, but no systematic comparisons with discharge references or intercomparisons have been conducted yet to evaluate this operator effect in LSPIV. In this paper, an analysis of a video gauging intercomparison, the Video Globe Challenge 2020, is proposed to evaluate such operator effect. The analysis is based on the gauging reports of the 15 to 23 participants using the Fudaa‐LSPIV software and intents to identify the most sensitive parameters for the eight videos. The analysis highlighted the significant impact of the time interval, the grid points and the filters on the LSPIV discharge measurements. These parameters are often inter‐dependent and should be correctly set together to strongly reduce the discharge errors. Based on the results, several automated tools were proposed to reduce the operator effect. These tools consist of several parameter assistants to automatically set the orthorectification resolution, the grid and the time interval, and of a sequence of systematic and automatic filters to ensure reliable velocity measurements used for discharge estimation. The application of the assisted LSPIV workflow using the proposed tools leads to significant improvements of the discharge measurements with strong reductions of the inter‐participant variability. On the eight videos, the mean interquartile range of the discharge errors is reduced from 17% to 5% and the mean discharge bias is reduced from −9% to 1% with the assisted LSPIV workflow. The remaining inter‐participant variability is mainly due to the user‐defined surface velocity coefficient α .