Term prelabor rupture of membranes: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) - INRAE - Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Année : 2022

Term prelabor rupture of membranes: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)

Résumé

Objective To determine the management of patients with term prelabor rupture of membranes. Methods Synthesis of the literature from the PubMed and Cochrane databases and the recommendations of French and foreign societies and colleges. Results Term prelabor rupture of membranes is considered a physiological process until 12 h have passed since rupture (professional consensus). In cases of expectant management and with a low rate of antibiotic prophylaxis, home care may be associated with an increase in neonatal infections (LE3), compared with hospitalization, especially for women with group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization (LE3). Home care is therefore not recommended (grade C). In the absence of spontaneous labor within 12 h of rupture, antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the risk of maternal intrauterine infection but not of neonatal infection (LE3). Its use after 12 h of rupture in term prelabor rupture of the membranes is therefore recommended (grade C). When antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated, intravenous beta-lactams are recommended (grade C). Induction of labor with oxytocin (LE1), prostaglandin E2 (LE1), or misoprostol (LE1) is associated with shorter rupture-to-delivery intervals than expectant management; immediate induction is not, however, associated with lower rates of neonatal infection (LE1), even among women with a positive GBS vaginal swab (LE2). Thus, expectant management can be offered without increasing the risk of neonatal infection (grade B). Induction of labor is not associated with either an increase or decrease in the cesarean rate (LE2), regardless of parity (LE2) or Bishop score at admission (LE3). Induction can thus be proposed without increasing the risk of cesarean delivery (grade B). No induction method (oxytocin, dinoprostone, misoprostol, or Foley catheter) has demonstrated superiority over any another method for reducing rates of intrauterine or neonatal infection or of cesarean delivery or for shortening the rupture-to-delivery intervals, regardless of parity or the Bishop score. Conclusion Term prelabor rupture of membranes is a frequent event. A 12-hour interval without onset of spontaneous labor was chosen to differentiate a physiological condition from a potentially unsafe situation that justifies antibiotic prophylaxis. Expectant management or induction of labor can each be proposed, even in case of positive screening for group streptococcus. The decision should depend on the woman's wishes and maternity unit organization (professional consensus).
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-03346326 , version 1 (16-09-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Marie-Victoire Sénat, Thomas Schmitz, Hanane Bouchghoul, Caroline Diguisto, Aude Girault, et al.. Term prelabor rupture of membranes: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2022, pp.1-5. ⟨10.1080/14767058.2020.1810230⟩. ⟨hal-03346326⟩
33 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More