While most producers in recent decades have relied on commercial yeasts (ADY) as their primary choice given their reliability and reproducibility, the fear of standardising the taste and properties of wine has led to the employment of alternative strategies that involve autochthonous yeasts such as pied de cuve (PdC) and spontaneous fermentation (SF). However, the impact of different fermentation strategies on wine has been a subject of debate and speculation. Consequently, this study describes, for the first time, the differences between the three kinds of fermentation at the metabolomic, chemical, and sensory levels in two wines: Chardonnay and Pinot Noir. The results showed how the yeast chosen significantly impacted the molecular composition of the wines, as revealed by metabolomic analysis that identified biomarkers with varying chemical compositions according to the fermentation modality. Notably, higher numbers of lipid markers were found for SF and PdC than ADY, which contained more peptides. Key molecules from the metabolic amino acid pathway, which are addressed in this article, showed evidence of such variations. In addition, the analysis of volatile aromatic compounds revealed an increase in groups of compounds specific to each fermentation. The sensorial analysis of Chardonnay wine showed a more qualitative sensory outcome (Higher fruit intensity) for ADY and SF compared to PdC. Our finding challenges the common speculation among wine producers that autochthonous yeast fermentations may offer greater complexity and uniqueness in comparison to commercial yeast fermentations.