How to analyse multiple ordinal scores in a clinical trial? Multivariate vs. univariate analysis - INRAE - Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2011

How to analyse multiple ordinal scores in a clinical trial? Multivariate vs. univariate analysis

Didier Concordet

Résumé

Objectives: Longitudinal measurements of ordinal responses are very frequent in clinical trials to assess drug efficacy and side effects. Usually, several scores are recorded and this multiplicity is an issue for data analysis. Most of the time, each score is analysed separately or an average/aggregated score is used. Both approaches, however, ignore the correlations between scores which very often document different aspects of a same physio-pathological process (e.g. pain, inflammation) and, in the last case, the actual metric of the scores is not taken into account. Very few methods exist to analyse several scores simultaneously [1, 2]. In 2008, Todem et al. proposed a method for the analysis of longitudinal bivariate ordinal data using probit-linear mixed effects models [2]. We propose to generalise their approach and apply it to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses. Methods: We use the concept of latent variables to derive the joint distribution of K ordinal responses. Each ordinal response Yk (k = 1…K) is viewed as the categorisation of a continuous, unobserved variable denoted Zk which is the true variable of interest. We use mixed effects models for the K latent variables, assuming that the random effects for subject i at time tij (inter- and intra-individual variability) are correlated across scores. Model estimation is performed with a SAEM[3, 4]-like algorithm implemented in C++. The multivariate normal cumulative distribution function is approximated using Gauss-Legendre quadratures. Two simulation studies were carried out with different scenarios to assess the applicability of our method. Drug dose or time-varying drug concentration was used as a covariate in the model. In the end, a principal component analysis was performed to summarise the correlations between scores. Results: Our method allowed correct estimation of all model parameters, including correlations between scores. As expected, multivariate and univariate analyses gave different results regarding the percentage of subjects within each “crossing” category. In contrast, they produced similar estimation of marginal distributions. Conclusions: We show that a multivariate analysis can be more appropriate than separate univariate analyses for the assessment of drug efficacy and safety and offers new perspectives in terms of benefit-risk ratio evaluation. The latent variable approach provides a good framework for the modelling of drug effects through various response models.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
79-LAFFONT PAGE 2011_1.pdf (451.57 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-02750398 , version 1 (03-06-2020)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-02750398 , version 1
  • PRODINRA : 167372

Citer

Céline M. Laffont, Didier Concordet. How to analyse multiple ordinal scores in a clinical trial? Multivariate vs. univariate analysis. 2. Biostatistics Conference of the Central European Network, Sep 2011, Zurich, Switzerland. ⟨hal-02750398⟩
9 Consultations
13 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More