Ensemble modelling of carbon fluxes in grasslands and croplands - INRAE - Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Field Crops Research Année : 2020

Ensemble modelling of carbon fluxes in grasslands and croplands

Pete Smith
Val Snow
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jean-François Soussana
Bruno Basso
  • Fonction : Auteur
Christopher D Dorich
  • Fonction : Auteur
Matthew Harrison
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1043972
Lianhai Wu
  • Fonction : Auteur
Qing Zhang Aa
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Croplands and grasslands are agricultural systems that contribute to land-atmosphere exchanges of carbon (C). We evaluated and compared gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (RECO), net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO 2 , and two derived outputs-C use efficiency (CUE=-NEE/GPP) and C emission intensity (Int C =-NEE/Offtake [grazed or harvested biomass]). The outputs came from 23 models (11 crop-specific, eight grassland-specific, and four models covering both systems) at three cropping sites over several rotations with spring and winter cereals, soybean and rapeseed in Canada, France and India, and two temperate permanent grasslands in France and the United Kingdom. The models were run independently over multi-year simulation periods in five stages (S), either blind with no calibration and initialization data (S1), using historical management and climate for initialization (S2), calibrated against plant data (S3), plant and soil data together (S4), or with the addition of C and N fluxes (S5). Here, we provide a framework to address methodological uncertainties and contextualize results. Most of the models overestimated or underestimated the C fluxes observed during the growing seasons (or the whole years for grasslands), with substantial differences between models. For T each simulated variable, changes in the multi-model median (MMM) from S1 to S5 was used as a descriptor of the ensemble performance. Overall, the greatest improvements (MMM approaching the mean of observations) were achieved at S3 or higher calibration stages. For instance, grassland GPP MMM was equal to 1632 g C m −2 yr-1 (S5) while the observed mean was equal to 1763 m-2 yr-1 (average for two sites). Nash-Sutcliffe modelling efficiency coefficients indicated that MMM outperformed individual models in 92.3 % of cases. Our study suggests a cautious use of large-scale, multi-model ensembles to estimate C fluxes in agricultural sites if some site-specific plant and soil observations are available for model calibration. The further development of crop/ grassland ensemble modelling will hinge upon the interpretation of results in light of the way models represent the processes underlying C fluxes in complex agricultural systems (grassland and crop rotations including fallow periods).
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Sandor_Ensemble_2020.pdf (3 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-02905731 , version 1 (07-12-2023)

Identifiants

Citer

Renata Sandor, Fiona Ehrhardt, Peter Grace, Sylvie Recous, Pete Smith, et al.. Ensemble modelling of carbon fluxes in grasslands and croplands. Field Crops Research, 2020, ⟨10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107791⟩. ⟨hal-02905731⟩
206 Consultations
4 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More